Reso24 16252 - Laserfiche WebLink

Browse Search

58 Prior EIR Determination Effect Peculiar to Project Site? New Significant Effect? New Significant Off- Site, Cumulative Impact? New Information, More Severe Adverse Impact? DTPP EIR DTPP Plan- Wide Amendments SEIR Focused GPU EIR VII. GEOLOGY AND SOILS – Would the project: a) Directly or indirectly cause potential substantial adverse effects, including the risk of loss, injury, or death involving: i) Rupture of a known earthquake fault, as delineated on the most recent Alquist- Priolo Earthquake Fault Zoning Map issued by the State Geologist for the area or based on other substantial evidence of a known fault? (Refer to Division of Mines and Geology Special Publication 42.) LTS LTS LTS No No No No ii) Strong seismic ground shaking? LTS LTS LTS No No No No iii) Seismic-related ground failure, including liquefaction? LTS LTS LTS No No No No iv) Landslides? LTS LTS LTS No No No No b) Result in substantial soil erosion or the loss of topsoil? LTS with Mitigation LTS with Mitigation LTS No No No No c) Be located on a geologic unit or soil that is unstable, or that would become unstable as a result of the project, and potentially result in on- or off-site landslide, lateral spreading, subsidence, liquefaction, or collapse? LTS LTS LTS No No No No d) Be located on expansive soil, as defined in Table 18-1-B of the Uniform Building Code (1994), creating substantial direct or indirect risks to life or property? LTS with Mitigation LTS with Mitigation LTS No No No No e) Have soils incapable of adequately supporting the use of septic tanks or alternative wastewater disposal systems where sewers are not available for the disposal of wastewater? Not Addressed LTS LTS No No No No f) Directly or indirectly destroy a unique paleontological resource or site or unique geologic feature? LTS with Mitigation LTS with Mitigation LTS No No No No Documentation: 1900 Broadway Component: a. i) The Downtown Precise Plan project area is located within the seismically active San Francisco Bay Area. The significant earthquakes that occur in the Bay Area are generally associated with crustal movement along well-defined, active fault zones of the San Andreas Fault system, which trends in a northwesterly direction. Seismic hazards impacts (i.e., impacts related to surface rupture, ground shaking, differential settlement, landslides, liquefaction, and lateral spreading) were discussed in the DTPP EIR and Plan-Wide Amendments SEIR, and they were identified as less-than- significant impacts and adequately mitigated by the regulatory framework and applicable local policies. The project component site is located approximately 3.75 miles northeast of the San Andreas Fault. Two other major active faults in the area are the Hayward Fault, located more than 10 miles from the project component site, and the San Gregorio-Seal Cove Fault, located approximately 14.75 miles from the project component site (DTPP program EIR p. 16-1). The project component site is not within an Alquist-Priolo Earthquake Fault Zone (DTPP program EIR p. 16-1); therefore, there is no known potential for fault rupture on the site. ATTY/RESO.0074/CC RESO 847 WOODSIDE (CEQA) - EXHIBIT 1 - CEQA CONSISTENCY CHECKLIST REV: 10-23-24 VR Page 58 of 135