Laserfiche WebLink
2. a greater number of total votes than newly elected members, and <br />3. current term expiration. <br />What seems to be more fair in terms of seniority, and given that the Mayor and <br />Vice Mayor terms are for 2-year durations, would be as follows: <br />Member seniority Recent election Election results Current Term <br />Served as Mayor <br /> year Expiration <br />Martinzez Saballos (D4) 2024, 2022* 100% 2028 No <br />Eakin (D5) 2022 100% 2026 No <br />Sturken (D2) 2022 41%/ 1,092 2026 No <br />Howard (D6) 2022 75%/ 3,365 2026 Yes <br />Padilla (D7) 2024 54%/ 3,181 2028 No <br />Chu (D3) 2024 50%/ 1,400 2028 No <br />Gee (D1) 2024 100% 2028 Yes <br />Having the criteria of whether or not a council member has previously served as <br />Mayor as the over-riding factor, outweighing all other factors, does not seem fair <br />to the council member or City residents, especially in light of elections being by <br />district vs at-large. <br />I respectfully request that the Governance sub-committee and staff reconsider the <br />Mayor Rotation Policy to include these modifications. <br />Sincerely, <br />Rona Gundrum <br />36-year Redwood Shores resident