Laserfiche WebLink
<br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />www.lfrep.com <br />Dear Members of the Redwood City Council & Planning Commission, <br /> <br />As you know, Longfellow Real Estate Partners first submitted our pre -application for the <br />Redwood LIFE Evolve project in May 2021. During the four years since that submittal, <br />we and the City and the community have invested countless hours meeting, <br />investigating, discussing, and asking and answering questions about the project, its <br />design, benefits and viability. We have held dozens of meetings with community <br />members, sent thousands of mailers to the surrounding community, held multiple open <br />houses, and have engaged openly and in good faith with a wide range of interested <br />parties. <br /> <br />When we last met with the City Council in the summer of 2023, Council directed City <br />staff to lead a two-fold effort: <br /> <br />• First, to undertake an initial investigation (dubbed a “Sensitivity Analysis”) to <br />understand if there were environmental factors that could inform a reduced <br />project alternative, and <br />• Second, to work with the community and Longfellow to develop a consensus <br />around a reduced project alternative that would be studied alongside the original <br />project application in a dual -track EIR. <br />City Council requested a project status update in eighteen months. <br /> <br />Here we are, eighteen months later, and the City’s team has completed those tasks. <br />The Sensitivity Analysis, while giving a helpful preview of the issues and topics that will <br />be addressed in much more detail in the EIR, showed no significant environmental <br />factors that would preclude development at the site and showed that, as expected, the <br />most meaningful project component to adjust is project size. Therefore, instead of <br />leaning on environmental factors, the City (and Longfellow) looked primarily to <br />community voices to develop two reduced project alternatives. Alternative #1 presents a <br />reduction of net new square footage of about 10% from the project application; <br />Alternative #2 takes a much larger cut and reduces the net new square footage by 20%. <br />Alternative #2 also materially increases the distance of new buildings to the nearest <br />neighbors to 250 feet, doubles the setback of buildings from the slough, increases the <br />acreage of open space by over five acres, reduces vehicle trips and parking spaces, <br />and reduces the total number of new life science buildings by three. <br /> <br />The response in the community has been positive and many Redwood Shores <br />neighbors are now coalescing around Alternative #2. This consensus is best <br />demonstrated by Stop Redwood LIFE, which represents over 1,500 petition signers <br />from Redwood Shores who were all previously opposed to the original project <br />application. Stop Redwood LIFE circulated a survey in February describing Alternative <br />#2 and asking their supporters whether Alternative #2 is acceptable. Over 65% of the <br />129 respondents voted ”YES .” We now ask that City Council direct staff to proceed