My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Browse
Search
Reso25 16295
RedwoodCity
>
City Clerk
>
Resolutions
>
City Council
>
2020-2029
>
2025
>
Reso25 16295
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/29/2025 3:54:43 PM
Creation date
4/29/2025 3:53:44 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CC Index
CC Index - Document Type
Resolution
Meeting Type
Regular
Agency Type
City Council
Date
4/28/2025
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
153
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br /> <br /> <br />103 <br /> The project component would be compatible with existing zoning and land uses as designated by the DTPP and the <br />Redwood City General Plan. The Commercial Component fits within the development envelope allowed in the DTPP <br />as amended by the DTPP Plan-Wide Amendments, and the office cap is subject to amendment (see item #10 above <br />describing project approvals) as part of the streamlining approvals. The SEIR evaluated the full impact of an increased <br />office cap to include the six “Gatekeeper Projects” (see item #8, in “901 El Camino Real Component: Previous CEQA <br />Analysis,” above), including a prior version of the Commercial Component, which was included in the scope of <br />programmatic environmental review in the SEIR. While the amount of office space currently proposed by the <br />Commercial Component is now 305,225 square feet rather than the 259,000 square feet analyzed in the SEIR, the <br />Commercial Component is within the total office cap and is consistent with the R&D uses evaluated in the SEIR. For <br />these reasons, the Commercial Component is considered consistent with the density provided in the DTPP as amended <br />by the DTPP Plan-Wide Amendments, for which the SEIR was certified. <br /> The DTPP Plan-Wide Amendments program SEIR (pp. 4-12 through 4-16) concurred with the DTPP EIR conclusion, <br />and also included an updated discussion pertaining to future citywide development and potentials for conflicts with <br />plans, policies, or regulations adopted for the purpose of avoiding or mitigating an environmental effect, such as Plan <br />Bay Area 2050, the Airport Land Use Compatibility Plan, the General Plan, the DTPP, and the Zoning Code. The <br />DTPP Plan-Wide Amendments program SEIR (p. 4-16) also concluded this impact would be less than significant. <br /> The Commercial component would not conflict with any applicable land use plan, policy, or regulation of agencies <br />with jurisdiction over the project (DTPP EIR pp. 4-18 through 4-21). The Commercial Component complies with all <br />applicable DTPP Standards relevant to community arrangement and land use compatibility. As a result, the impact <br />would be less than significant, and no land use planning impacts are anticipated beyond those previously identified <br />and analyzed in the DTPP program EIR. This component would be consistent with the analysis in the EIR/SEIR <br />because it would not create new impacts or increase impacts, and there is no new information of substantial importance <br />for CEQA purposes. <br />CONCLUSION <br />With regards to the issue area of Land Use and Planning, the following findings can be made: (1) no peculiar impacts <br />to the Commercial Component or its site have been identified, (2) there are no potentially significant effects or off- <br />site and/or cumulative impacts which were not discussed by the EIR/SEIR, (3) no substantial new information has <br />been identified which results in an impact which is more severe than anticipated by the EIR/SEIR, and (4) no <br />mitigation measures contained within the EIR/SEIR would be required because the project component specific impacts <br />would be less than significant. For these reasons, the land use and planning impacts of the proposed Commercial <br />Component would be consistent with the impacts identified in the EIR/SEIR and this component does not require <br />additional environmental review under CEQA Guidelines section 15183. <br /> <br />Housing Component: <br />a The Focused GPU program EIR (pp. 4.11-14 and 4.11-15) concluded that although facilitation of development under <br />the Focused GPU would result in the construction of additional residential units within the planning area, no major <br />infrastructure or circulation changes would be proposed that would serve to physically divide the community. The <br />Focused GPU also would not result in substantial changes in the physical arrangement of the city and established <br />community-wide land use patterns. For these reasons, the impacts were considered to be less than significant. The <br />Focused GPU has been adopted as amendments to and incorporated into the City’s General Plan. <br /> The proposed Housing Component complies with all applicable Focused GPU standards relevant to community <br />arrangement and land use compatibility and would contribute to the beneficial land use effects in the area. As a result, <br />the land use compatibility impacts are less than significant and are not anticipated beyond those previously identified <br />and analyzed in the Focused GPU program EIR. Also see item XIV(a), Population and Housing, below. This Housing <br />Component would be consistent with the analysis in the EIR/SEIR because it would not create new impacts or increase <br />impacts, and there is no new information of substantial importance for CEQA purposes. <br />b. This is no longer in Appendix G of the CEQA Guidelines. <br />c. The Focused GPU EIR found less than significant impacts related to conflicts with any land use plans, policies, or <br />regulations adopted for the purpose of avoiding or mitigating an environmental effect. <br /> The Housing component would be located on the west side of SR 84 (Woodside Road) north of El Camino Real. Uses <br />along Woodside Road include neighborhood‐serving retail and services and a large concentration of multi‐unit <br />residential buildings, plus an area with commercial, retail, and office/professional uses. In proximity to the Housing <br />ATTY/RESO.0028/CC RESO CEQA GUIDLINES (920 SHASTA) - EXHIBIT A <br />REV: 04-22-25 VR <br /> <br />Page 103 of 148
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.