My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Browse
Search
Reso25 16295
RedwoodCity
>
City Clerk
>
Resolutions
>
City Council
>
2020-2029
>
2025
>
Reso25 16295
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/29/2025 3:54:43 PM
Creation date
4/29/2025 3:53:44 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CC Index
CC Index - Document Type
Resolution
Meeting Type
Regular
Agency Type
City Council
Date
4/28/2025
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
153
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br /> <br /> <br />30 <br /> <br /> <br />Prior EIR Determination Effect <br />Peculiar to <br />Project <br />Site? <br />New <br />Significant <br />Effect? <br />New <br />Significant Off- <br />Site, <br />Cumulative <br />Impact? <br />New <br />Information, <br />More Severe <br />Adverse <br />Impact? DTPP EIR <br />DTPP Plan- <br />Wide <br />Amendments <br />SEIR <br />Focused <br />GPU EIR <br />II. AGRICULTURE AND FORESTRY RESOURCES – Would the project: <br />a) Convert Prime Farmland, Unique Farmland, <br />or Farmland of Statewide Importance <br />(Farmland), as shown on the maps prepared <br />pursuant to the Farmland Mapping and <br />Monitoring Program of the California <br />Resources Agency, to non-agricultural use? <br />No <br />Impact <br />No <br />Impact <br />No <br />Impact No No No No <br />b) Conflict with existing zoning for <br />agricultural use, or a Williamson Act <br />contract? <br />No <br />Impact <br />No <br />Impact <br />No <br />Impact No No No No <br />c) Conflict with existing zoning for, or cause <br />rezoning of, forest land (as defined in Public <br />Resources Code section 12220(g)), <br />timberland (as defined by Public Resources <br />Code section 4526), or timberland zoned <br />Timberland Production (as defined by <br />Government Code section 51104(g))? <br />No <br />Impact <br />No <br />Impact <br />No <br />Impact No No No No <br />d) Result in the loss of forest land or <br />conversion of forest land to non-forest use? <br />No <br />Impact <br />No <br />Impact <br />No <br />Impact No No No No <br />e) Involve other changes in the existing <br />environment which, due to their location or <br />nature, could result in conversion of <br />Farmland to non-agricultural use or <br />conversion of forest land to non-forest use? <br />No <br />Impact <br />No <br />Impact <br />No <br />Impact No No No No <br /> <br /> <br />Documentation: <br /> <br />Existing Conditions: <br /> <br />The Commercial and Housing Components have a General Plan land use designation of Mixed Use – Downtown and Mixed- <br />Use Transitional, respectively. The 901 El Camino Real site is zoned P (Planned Community District, DTPP) and 920 Shasta <br />Street site is zoned MUT-Mixed-Use Transitional. These sites are currently developed with urban/suburban uses including <br />commercial buildings and parking with open space and creek at 901 El Camino Real and an existing mini warehouse personal <br />storage building with parking an existing single family home at 920 Shasta Street. Neither site contains any farmland, <br />agriculture use, forest or timberland. Nor is there any farmland, agricultural use, forest, or timberland located in the vicinity of <br />these project component sites. <br /> <br />Commercial Component: <br />a. No agricultural uses are located in the DTPP area, and the area does not contain any Prime Farmland, Unique <br />Farmland, or Farmland of Statewide Importance (DTPP program EIR p. 18-4, SEIR p. 18-7). The EIR and SEIR <br />therefore both concluded that there would be no impact of development in the DTPP on these resources. <br />As before, there are currently no Prime Farmland, Unique Farmland, or Farmland of Statewide Importance in the <br />DTPP area. The Commercial Component is located in a built-out urban environment and would not convert farmland <br />to a non-agricultural use. No impact would occur as a result of the proposed development. For these reasons, the <br />Commercial component would be consistent with the analysis in the EIR/SEIR and would not create new impacts or <br />increase impacts, and there is no new information of substantial importance for CEQA purposes. <br />ATTY/RESO.0028/CC RESO CEQA GUIDLINES (920 SHASTA) - EXHIBIT A <br />REV: 04-22-25 VR <br /> <br />Page 30 of 148
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.