My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Browse
Search
Reso25 16295
RedwoodCity
>
City Clerk
>
Resolutions
>
City Council
>
2020-2029
>
2025
>
Reso25 16295
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/29/2025 3:54:43 PM
Creation date
4/29/2025 3:53:44 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CC Index
CC Index - Document Type
Resolution
Meeting Type
Regular
Agency Type
City Council
Date
4/28/2025
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
153
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br /> <br /> <br />35 <br />The input data also considered project size, acreage, and land use (general office building, health club, and enclosed <br />parking with elevator). In addition, CalEEMod analysis was conducted for the new recycled water line, and those <br />results were included to incorporate water line construction emissions into the Commercial Component analysis (p. <br />20). Based on BAAQMD construction period thresholds of significance, the Illingworth & Rodkin (p. 20) determined <br />that “the predicted average daily project construction emissions would not exceed the BAAQMD significance <br />thresholds during any year of construction.” <br /> The analysis also included estimated emissions from operational activities and used CalEEMod to estimate emissions <br />from proposed operations, assuming full build-out. The analysis (pp. 21-24) estimated the Commercial Component’s <br />operation emissions using information provided by the applicant regarding vehicle trips for future employees (trip <br />generation rates were provided by the Commercial Component’s transportation consultant Kimley-Horn, and <br />conservative vehicle model years were used to reflect a more conservative emissions estimate); the diesel-powered <br />emergency generator; the two component evaporative cooling towers; and evaporative emissions from architectural <br />coatings and maintenance products (e.g., consumer products). Other inputs included emissions associated with solid <br />waste generation, water use/wastewater generation, and existing uses (to take into account the existing emissions <br />produced on the site). <br /> Illingworth & Rodkin (pp. 23-24) determined the daily emissions during Commercial Component operation of reactive <br />organic gases (ROG), nitrogen oxides (NOX), and total particulate matter (PM10 with particles having a diameter of <br />10 micrometers or less and PM2.5 with particles having a diameter of 2.5 micrometers or less). Based on BAAQMD <br />operational thresholds of significance, the analysis concluded, assuming year-round operations (e.g., 365 days of <br />operation), “The operational period emissions would not exceed the BAAQMD significance thresholds.” <br /> Because the Commercial Component would not exceed the construction and operational criterial air pollutant <br />significance thresholds established by BAAQMD, this component would result in less than significant impacts and <br />emission reduction measures in Mitigation Measure AQ-2b would not be required. For the reasons above, the <br />Commercial Component would not result in significant impacts that were not identified in the EIR/SEIR and no <br />additional mitigation measures would be required. Therefore, this component would be consistent with the analysis <br />within the EIR/SEIR because it would not create new impacts or increase impacts, and there is no new information of <br />substantial importance for CEQA purposes. <br />Potential for Cumulative Impacts <br /> Impacts associated with the two Project components were evaluated by Illingworth & Rodkin in a combined analysis <br />of emissions for both the Commercial and the Housing Components (“901 El Camino Real & 920 Shasta Street <br />Combined Construction & Operational Emissions;” Memo from Illingworth & Rodkin, Inc. to Melinda Hue, City of <br />Redwood City; December 5, 2024). The memo assessed the combined construction and operational emissions of both <br />Project components. Based on the anticipated construction schedule for 901 El Camino Real to start in 2025 and end <br />in 2027 and 920 Shasta Street to start in 2026 and end in 2027, Illingworth & Rodkin (p. 1) concluded that the two <br />construction schedules would overlap for the years 2026 and 2027, resulting in simultaneous construction emissions. <br />Illingworth & Rodkin used CalEEMod to estimate emissions from construction activity and operation for each project. <br />The land use types and size, anticipated construction schedule, traffic, and other factors were input to CalEEMod for <br />each development component as described above for the Commercial Component and below for the Housing <br />Component in item (b) – 920 Shasta Street. <br />For construction emissions, Illingworth & Rodkin (pp. 1-2) determined that the combined construction period <br />emissions do not exceed the BAAQMD thresholds of significance during any construction year (2025-2027). <br /> For operational emissions, Illingworth & Rodkin (p. 2) based its analysis on net increase in annual emissions and daily <br />emissions, assuming 365 days of operation. The analysis determined that net increases in annual and daily operational <br />emissions of ROG, NOX, total PM10, and total PM2.5 during operation of both components would not exceed the <br />BAAQMD thresholds of significance. <br /> The combined construction and operational impacts of both Project components would be considered less than <br />significant, resulting in a less than significant cumulative impact, and no additional mitigations would be required. <br />As previously discussed, the SEIR determined significant and unavoidable impacts to air quality with mitigation. <br />However, the Commercial Component, after implementation of Mitigation Measure AQ-2a, would be considered less <br />than significant, and no additional mitigations would be required. Therefore, the Commercial Component would be <br />consistent with the analysis within the EIR/SEIR because it would not create new impacts or increase impacts, and <br />there is no new information of substantial importance for CEQA purposes. <br />ATTY/RESO.0028/CC RESO CEQA GUIDLINES (920 SHASTA) - EXHIBIT A <br />REV: 04-22-25 VR <br /> <br />Page 35 of 148
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.