Reso25 16295 - Laserfiche WebLink

Browse Search

45 Prior EIR Determination Effect Peculiar to Project Site? New Significant Effect? New Significant Off- Site, Cumulative Impact? New Information, More Severe Adverse Impact? DTPP EIR DTPP Plan- Wide Amendments SEIR Focused GPU EIR IV. BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES – Would the project: a) Have a substantial adverse effect, either directly or through habitat modifications, on any species identified as a candidate, sensitive, or special status species in local or regional plans, policies, or regulations, or by the California Department of Fish and Wildlife or U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service? LTS with Mitigation LTS with Mitigation LTS with Mitigation No No No No b) Have a substantial adverse effect on any riparian habitat or other sensitive natural community identified in local or regional plans, policies, or regulations, or by the California Department of Fish and Wildlife or U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service? LTS with Mitigation LTS with Mitigation LTS with Mitigation No No No No c) Have a substantial adverse effect on state or federally protected wetlands (including, but not limited to, marsh, vernal pool, coastal, etc.) through direct removal, filling, hydrological interruption, or other means? LTS with Mitigation LTS with Mitigation LTS with Mitigation No No No No d) Interfere substantially with the movement of any native resident or migratory fish or wildlife species or with established native resident or migratory wildlife corridors, or impede the use of native wildlife nursery sites? LTS with Mitigation LTS with Mitigation LTS with Mitigation No No No No e) Conflict with any local policies or ordinances protecting biological resources, such as a tree preservation policy or ordinance? LTS with Mitigation LTS with Mitigation No Impact No No No No f) Conflict with the provisions of an adopted Habitat Conservation Plan, Natural Community Conservation Plan, or other approved, local, regional, or state habitat conservation plan? Not Addressed No Impact No Impact No No No No Documentation: Commercial Component: a. The DTPP Final EIR found that grading and construction activities associated with development could impact special- status plant or wildlife species in the coastal salt marsh along Redwood Creek. To reduce impacts on these species to a less-than-significant level, DTPP Final EIR Mitigation Measure 15-1(a) required consultation with federal and State wildlife agencies, and development of an appropriate project-specific mitigation plan in coordination with the agencies to determine if projects could result in a “take” of a federal or State-protected species. The DTPP Plan-Wide Amendments program SEIR concurred with the DTPP program EIR conclusion and identified Mitigation Measure BIO-1a (formerly Mitigation Measure 15-1(a) from the DTPP Final EIR) as applicable to the proposed DTPP Plan- Wide Amendments and sufficient to reduce potential impacts on special-status plant or wildlife species to a less-than- significant level. ATTY/RESO.0028/CC RESO CEQA GUIDLINES (920 SHASTA) - EXHIBIT A REV: 04-22-25 VR Page 45 of 148