Reso25 16295 - Laserfiche WebLink

Browse Search

77 Prior EIR Determination Effect Peculiar to Project Site? New Significant Effect? New Significant Off- Site, Cumulative Impact? New Information, More Severe Adverse Impact? DTPP EIR DTPP Plan- Wide Amendments SEIR Focused GPU EIR IX. HAZARDS AND HAZARDOUS MATERIALS – Would the project: a) Create a significant hazard to the public or the environment through the routine transport, use, or disposal of hazardous materials? LTS LTS LTS No No No No b) Create a significant hazard to the public or the environment through reasonably foreseeable upset and accident conditions involving the release of hazardous materials into the environment? LTS LTS LTS No No No No c) Emit hazardous emissions or handle hazardous or acutely hazardous materials, substances, or waste within one-quarter mile of an existing or proposed school? LTS LTS LTS No No No No d) Be located on a site which is included on a list of hazardous materials sites compiled pursuant to Government Code §65962.5 and, as a result, would it create a significant hazard to the public or the environment? LTS LTS LTS No No No No e) For a project located within an airport land use plan or, where such a plan has not been adopted, within two miles of a public airport or public use airport, would the project result in a safety hazard or excessive noise for people residing or working in the project area? LTS LTS LTS No No No No f) Impair implementation of, or physically interfere with. an adopted emergency response plan or emergency evacuation plan? LTS with Mitigation LTS LTS No No No No g) Expose people or structures, either directly or indirectly, to a significant risk of loss, injury, or death involving wildland fires? Not Addressed LTS LTS No No No No Documentation: Commercial Component: a. The DTPP program EIR (p. 14-12) concluded that while some hazardous substances may be generated, stored, transported, used, or disposed of in association with residential and non-residential development projects Downtown (e.g., cleaning supplies), existing local, State, and federal regulations and oversight would reduce the potential threat to a less-than-significant impact. The DTPP Plan-Wide Amendments program SEIR (pp. 14-8 and 14-9) concurred with the DTPP EIR conclusion but included additional discussion with respect to R&D lab use. The DTPP Plan-Wide Amendments program SEIR (p. 14-9) assumed “that these [R&D/Laboratory] uses could involve the use, manufacturing, storage, or transportation and disposal of biohazardous materials, chemical materials, and/or low-level radioactive materials, in addition to the more common hazardous materials that are associated with standard commercial operations (such as paints, cleaners and solvents).” The DTPP Plan-Wide Amendments program SEIR further explained how “the regulatory framework governing the use, storage, transportation and disposal of hazardous materials, including applicable federal, State and local regulations to which R&D/Laboratory uses would be required to adhere” would “prevent or reduce potential for injury to health and the environment.” In particular, according to the DTPP Plan-Wide Amendments program SEIR (p. 14-9), “The San Mateo County Health Department, ATTY/RESO.0028/CC RESO CEQA GUIDLINES (920 SHASTA) - EXHIBIT A REV: 04-22-25 VR Page 77 of 148