My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Browse
Search
Reso25 16295
RedwoodCity
>
City Clerk
>
Resolutions
>
City Council
>
2020-2029
>
2025
>
Reso25 16295
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/29/2025 3:54:43 PM
Creation date
4/29/2025 3:53:44 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CC Index
CC Index - Document Type
Resolution
Meeting Type
Regular
Agency Type
City Council
Date
4/28/2025
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
153
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br /> <br /> <br />87 <br />consistent with the analysis in the EIR/SEIR because it would not create new impacts or increase impacts, and there <br />is no new information of substantial importance for CEQA purposes. <br />f. The DTPP EIR determined that, because future development would create additional traffic congestion and could <br />possibly interfere with emergency response or evacuation, the DTPP would create a potentially significant impact as <br />it relates to impairment or interference with an adopted emergency response or evacuation plan. The DTPP EIR <br />includes Mitigation Measure 8-1, which would address this impact by providing signal prioritization for emergency <br />vehicles at additional intersections where needed. The DTPP EIR concluded that implementation of Mitigation <br />Measure 8-1 would reduce the potential impacts to a less-than-significant level. The DTPP Plan-Wide Amendments <br />program SEIR concurred and determined that Mitigation Measure 8-1 had been implemented and the Plan-Wide <br />Amendments would not add any new traffic signals, so the impacts would be less than significant. <br /> The Commercial Component design would be required to comply with all applicable City codes and regulations <br />pertaining to emergency access, as well as fire protection and security. DTPP program EIR Mitigation 8-1 requires <br />the City to implement signal detectors at selected intersections as needed over time to provide priority traffic signal <br />timing for emergency response vehicles. The DTPP Plan-Wide Amendments program SEIR (pp. 14-12 through 14- <br />13) concurred with the DTPP EIR conclusion; in addition, the DTPP Plan-Wide Amendments program SEIR noted <br />that, “the City has implemented signal prioritization at 15 intersections in the Downtown, including around Fire Station <br />No. 9 on Marshall Street, and at more intersections in the vicinity, effectively implementing Mitigation Measure 8- <br />1.” As a City standard condition of approval for all development projects, the project component applicant must <br />prepare a mandatory construction traffic routing and parking plan subject to City review and approval, to ensure that <br />adequate emergency access is maintained during construction; all traffic control for lane closures during construction <br />shall conform to the Work Area Traffic Control Handbook administered by the City. As a result of the above <br />requirements, the proposed component would not impair or interfere with emergency access, and the impact is <br />considered less than significant. As a result, this Commercial Component would be consistent with the analysis in the <br />EIR/SEIR because it would not create new impacts or increase impacts, and there is no new information of substantial <br />importance for CEQA purposes. <br />g. The DTPP EIR did not analyze the impacts on the DTPP as it relates to wildland fires. According to the published <br />CAL FIRE FRAP map of the City of Redwood City, a majority of the city is not within an established VHFHSZ. The <br />DTPP Plan-Wide Amendments program SEIR (p. 14-13) noted that state and local laws are in effect that are intended <br />to reduce the ignition and spread of wildfire and found the DTPP Plan-Wide Amendments would have less-than- <br />significant impacts. <br />The Commercial Component site is located in a downtown urban environment that is not adjacent to wildlands. <br />Therefore, the Commercial Component would not expose people or structures to a significant risk of loss, injury, or <br />death involving wildland fires. Accordingly, the impact is considered less than significant. This Commercial <br />Component would be consistent with the analysis in the EIR/SEIR because it would not create new impacts or increase <br />impacts, and there is no new information of substantial importance for CEQA purposes. <br /> <br /> CONCLUSION <br /> <br />With regards to the issue area of Hazards and Hazardous Materials, the following findings can be made: (1) no peculiar <br />impacts to the Commercial component or its site have been identified, (2) there are no potentially significant effects <br />or off-site and/or cumulative impacts which were not discussed by the EIR/SEIR, (3) no substantial new information <br />has been identified which results in an impact which is more severe than anticipated by the EIR/SEIR, and (4) no <br />mitigation measures contained within the EIR/SEIR would be required because the project component-specific <br />impacts would be less than significant. For these reasons, the hazardous and hazardous materials impacts of the <br />proposed Commercial component would be consistent with the impacts identified in the EIR/SEIR and this project <br />component does not require additional environmental review under CEQA Guidelines section 15183. <br /> <br />Housing Component <br />a. The Focused GPU EIR concluded that residential and mixed-use housing do not cause or contribute substantially to <br />potential hazards to the public or the environment because these uses do not involve the use, transport, or disposal or <br />appreciable amounts of hazardous materials of wastes (p. 4.9-19). Further, given the extensive federal, State, and <br />local hazardous materials regulations already in place, the implementation of the Focused GPU was found not to create <br />a significant hazard to the public or the environment from hazardous materials transport, storage, use and disposal. <br />The impact was found to be less than significant. <br />ATTY/RESO.0028/CC RESO CEQA GUIDLINES (920 SHASTA) - EXHIBIT A <br />REV: 04-22-25 VR <br /> <br />Page 87 of 148
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.