Reso25 16295 - Laserfiche WebLink

Browse Search

91 The proposed Housing Component is not located on a site which is included on a list of hazardous materials sites compiled pursuant to Government Code Section 65962.5 (Cortese List) (https://calepa.ca.gov/sitecleanup/corteselist/, viewed 6/11/24). While the subject site is not located on a Cortese List database, the site is included on the State Water Resources Control Board GeoTracker database listings as “Informational Item / Review Complete As Of 9/10/2021” (T10000017352). According to the Water Board, the “Informational Item/Review Completed” status means “Review of site has been completed. Most or all relevant information about the site record has been stored in GeoTracker and there does not appear to be a need for a regulatory case at this time. No significant additional work is required.”24 The information provided through GeoTracker indicates that the Housing Component applicant “is planning to enter into a CLRRA Agreement with DTSC to develop and implement a Site Assessment Plan and a Response Plan, if required, with the intent to develop the Site into affordable housing.”25 As discussed above in c. under “Post-Limited Phase II ESA Activities,” the Housing Component developer has entered into the CLRRA Agreement. Housing Component compliance with DTSC regulations and measures deemed necessary for the site would adequately address any potential impacts associated with exposure to contaminated soil and/or groundwater and/or hazardous fumes. The City would require DTSC issuance of a Certificate of Completion or No Further Action prior to the beginning of building construction. The Housing Component’s impacts would be less than significant. As a result, this Housing Component would be consistent with the analysis in the Focused GPU EIR because it would not create new impacts or increase impacts, and there is no new information of substantial importance for CEQA purposes. e. The Focused GPU EIR Planning Area is located within both Area A and Area B of the San Carlos Airport Influence Area The project component site is located within (Focused GPU EIR, Figure 4.9-1). It found that implementation of the Focused GPU would potentially place new residential development in Area B of the AIA, which would trigger a consistency analysis with relevant ALUCP policies. With regulatory compliance, the Focused GPU EIR determined that the impact would be less than significant. The Housing Component site is located in Area A of the San Carlos Airport Influence Area. Federal Aviation Regulation (FAR) Part 77, Section 77.9 requires notice to the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) by developers proposing structures taller than the indicated elevations (see Focused GPU EIR p. 4.9-24). Applicable development must file Form 7460-1 with the FAA at least 30 days before the proposed construction. The Housing Component site is located outside the FAA Notification boundary for maximum building height for the San Carlos Airport (i.e., the Housing Component site is located more than 10,000 feet from the San Carlos Airport runway); this component does not require FAA notification (San Mateo County C/CAG, Comprehensive ALUCP for the Environs of San Carlos Airport, Exhibit 4-4a: FAA Notification Form 7460-1 Filing Requirements; adopted October 2015, amended October 13, 2022; Focused GPU EIR, Figure 4.9-2). Implementation of the proposed Housing Component would not result in an airplane-related safety hazard for people residing or working in the Housing Component vicinity. The impacts related to safety and noise hazards associated with airports would be less than significant. As a result, this Housing Component would be consistent with the analysis in the EIR/SEIR because it would not create new impacts or increase impacts, and there is no new information of substantial importance for CEQA purposes. f. The Focused GPU EIR noted all major public streets in Redwood City, including Woodside Road, serve as principal evacuation routes (p. 4.9-25). While it is possible the Housing Component may result in circulation changes during project construction, any circulation changes would be temporary and limited to the immediate site vicinity. The Redwood City General Plan contains policies and implementation programs that require developments to plan for evacuation scenarios and ensure adequate emergency access to and from the site. In addition, project design and Housing Component construction activities would be required to comply with all applicable City codes and regulations pertaining to emergency access, as well as fire protection and security. The Focused GPU EIR concluded the General Plan Public Safety Element policies and implementation programs and the City’s development review process would 24 State Water Resources Control Board GeoTracker, “Non-Case Information Status Definitions,” https://geotracker.waterboards.ca.gov/Non-Case%20Information%20Status%20Definitions.pdf, accessed 6/11/24. 25 Department of Toxic Substances Control (DTSC), letter to San Francisco Bay Regional Water Quality Control Board, San Mateo County Environmental Health Services, Groundwater Protection Program-San Mateo County Environmental Health, Bay Area Air Quality Management District, Redwood City Planning and GIS, Redwood City Public Works, and San Francisco Public Utilities Commission, re “Notification of Proposed Agreement Under California Land Reuse and Revitalization Act for the 920 Shasta RWC Property Located at 920 Shasta Street and 122 Buckeye Street, Redwood City, California 94063,” dated May 18, 2023 (https://documents.geotracker.waterboards.ca.gov/regulators/deliverable_documents/8311917960/20230518%20920%20Shas ta%20RWC%20Host%20Jurisdiction%20Letter.pdf, accessed 6/11/24). The CLRRA is the “California Land Reuse and Revitalization Act of 2004.” ATTY/RESO.0028/CC RESO CEQA GUIDLINES (920 SHASTA) - EXHIBIT A REV: 04-22-25 VR Page 91 of 148