Laserfiche WebLink
<br /> <br /> <br />99 <br /> The Housing Component would incorporate traditional low impact development (LID) treatment measures in the <br />onsite stormwater system design to meet Provision C.3 permit and San Mateo Countywide Stormwater Pollution <br />Prevention Program (SMCSWPPP) requirements (Plan Set, Sheet C-6.1, 11/2022). Stormwater from the site would <br />be treated with a combination of bioretention areas, Silva Cells areas, and self-treating landscape areas. Each <br />bioretention area is sized according to C.3 Technical Guidance. The Housing Component would manage stormwater <br />runoff in 14 drainage management areas (DMA), which include a combination of on-site and off-site DMAs. Nine <br />(9) of the 14 DMAs would treat runoff in bioretention areas, three DMAs would treat runoff in self-retaining landscape <br />areas, and the remaining two DMAs (offsite) would treat runoff via the Silva Cell system. <br /> The Housing Component site is approximately 93 percent impervious. Site cover consists of existing buildings, <br />driveways and paved internal roadways (for the self-storage facility), and landscaping. The Housing Component build <br />out would result in 28,197 SF of onsite impervious surface area, compared to 32,767 SF of onsite impervious surface <br />area under existing conditions (Plan Set, Sheet C-6.1, 11/2022). Therefore, there would be a net decrease in total <br />impervious surface area amounting to 4,570 SF. Post-construction onsite pervious surface area would amount to 6,876 <br />SF. <br /> All stormwater data and components provided by the Housing Component applicant are subject to review, approval, <br />and onsite inspection by the City. The Housing Component would be subject to these standard requirements as <br />conditions of project component approval. As a result of Focused GPU standards and the City requirements described <br />above, the proposed Housing component would have a less than significant impact and would not generate additional <br />stormwater drainage impacts beyond those analyzed in the Focused GPU program EIR. Therefore, this Housing <br />component would be consistent with the analysis in the Focused GPU EIR because it would not create new impacts <br />or increase impacts, and there is no new information of substantial importance for CEQA purposes. <br />b. The City of Redwood City does not currently rely on groundwater as a water supply source. Groundwater impacts <br />were analyzed in the Focused GPU EIR and were determined to be less than significant impacts because Redwood <br />City did not then have and had no intention of using groundwater as a water supply, so future development within the <br />planning area would not have caused a depletion of groundwater supplies. Additionally, because future developments <br />would largely be constructed on previously developed land, there would not be a substantial increase in impervious <br />surfaces. Because the Focused GPU implementation would not substantially decrease water supplies or interfere <br />substantially with groundwater recharge, this impact was found to be less than significant. <br /> Implementation of the proposed Housing Component would not require substantial amounts of water such that it <br />would result in substantially depleted groundwater supplies (see item XIX[b] [water supply] of this checklist). Under <br />the State’s Sustainable Groundwater Management Act (SGMA), medium and high priority groundwater basins are <br />required to prepare a Groundwater Sustainability Plan (GSP). The Housing Component site is located in the San <br />Mateo Plain Subbasin – Santa Clara Valley Basin, which according to the City of Redwood City 2020 Urban Water <br />Management Plan (UWMP) has been ranked as a “very low priority” basin and is therefore not subject to the <br />requirements of SGMA. In addition, as discussed in item (a) above, there would be a net decrease in impervious <br />surface area. Therefore, the proposed Housing Component would not substantially decrease groundwater supplies or <br />interfere substantially with groundwater recharge such that the project component would impede sustainable <br />groundwater management of the basin. The Focused GPU program EIR (Focused GPU program EIR pp. 4.10-18 <br />through 4.10-19) concluded that although the City is currently evaluating groundwater as a potential future emergency <br />or back-up supply source, there is no guarantee that future development projects would use groundwater for water <br />supply, and instead would rely on potable water purchased from SFPUC (distributed by the City) and recycled water <br />from the City. The Focused GPU program EIR also concluded that increases in new impervious areas associated with <br />future development within the City, including the Housing Component, would be expected to be minimal and would <br />not be expected to interfere substantially with groundwater recharge. Therefore, the Housing Component would not <br />substantially decrease water supplies or interfere substantially with groundwater recharge such that the Housing <br />Component would impede sustainable groundwater management of the basin. This impact would be less than <br />significant. This component would be consistent with the analysis in the Focused GPU EIR because it would not create <br />new impacts or increase impacts, and there is no new information of substantial importance for CEQA purposes. <br />c. As discussed in the Focused GPU program EIR (pp. 4.10-19 and 4.10-21), development facilitated by the Focused <br />GPU would occur in areas of the City that are currently developed, and increases in impervious surfaces would be <br />relatively minimal (i.e., new impervious surfaces would generally replace existing impervious surfaces and either <br />result in a decrease in impervious surface area due to more extensive use of stormwater control measures or result in <br />a small net increase in impervious surface area). As discussed in item (a) above and the subparts below, the proposed <br />Housing Component would therefore not substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of project component site. <br />In addition, the rate or amount of surface runoff would not be substantially increased by new development because <br />ATTY/RESO.0031/CC RESO CEQA GUIDELINES (901 EL CAMINO REAL) <br />REV: 04-22-25 VR <br /> <br />Page 99 of 148