Laserfiche WebLink
<br /> <br /> <br />69 <br />seismic events, in addition to the potential for liquefaction or landslides. The Focused GPU EIR concluded that with <br />implementation of Public Safety Element and compliance with the regulatory framework, impacts related to unstable <br />soils would be reduced to less than significant. <br />No changes to geologic substructures are expected to occur as a result of Housing Component implementation. As <br />described in item (a) above, the proposed Housing Component would comply with all applicable local and State codes <br />and regulations, and Housing Component design would incorporate City-approved geotechnical recommendations for <br />site development. This impact is considered less than significant. All grading plans are subject to City review and <br />approval. <br /> Also see item (a) above for a summary of the geotechnical report findings regarding proposed foundation types and <br />techniques recommended to counter the high expansion potential of onsite surface soils. <br /> As the proposed Housing Component would have a less-than-significant impact with the incorporation of standard <br />conditions and compliance with the regulatory framework, it would be consistent with the Focused GPU EIR. It would <br />not create new impacts or increase impacts and there is no new information of substantial importance for CEQA <br />purposes. <br />d. The Focused GPU EIR determined portions of the Planning Area contain soils that have a high clay content, creating <br />expansion potential (p. 4.7-16). This type of soil constraint could impact future structures and their occupants within <br />the Planning Area. The Focused GPU EIR concluded existing General Plan policies and programs intended to protect <br />against geologic and seismic hazards, including Policies PS-6.1 and PS-6.1 and Programs PS-23 and PS-24, in <br />conjunction with conformance with the California State Building Code (which shall be required as conditions of <br />approval for the project component) would reduce the project component’s potential effects related to soil constraints, <br />including expansive soils, to a less-than-significant level. <br /> According to the Housing Component-specific geotechnical report (p. 9), laboratory testing results show the surface <br />soils of the project component site consist of clay with high plasticity underlain by loose to dense clayey and silty <br />sands (p. 3). The site’s soils have a high expansion potential when subjected to fluctuations in moisture levels. The <br />geotechnical report recommends that the building foundation should consist of a relatively thick mat with stiffening <br />grade beams or, alternatively, a series of rigid continuous spread footings constructed in a grid pattern (pp. 9-10). Due <br />to the potential for liquefaction and the expansion potential of the site’s soils, a structural slab floor at the ground level <br />would be preferable to conventional slab-on-grade floors from a geotechnical viewpoint. In addition, a layer of non- <br />expansive fill should be placed below slab floors. All recommended solutions would be subject to City review and <br />approval for feasibility and effectiveness. <br /> As discussed, the GPU EIR determined impacts from expansive soils to be less than significant with mitigation. As <br />the Housing Component would have a less-than-significant impact with the incorporation of standard conditions of <br />approval and compliance with the regulatory framework, it would be consistent with the Focused GPU EIR. It would <br />not create new impacts or increase impacts, and there is no new information of substantial importance for CEQA <br />purposes. <br />e. The Focused GPU EIR did not address impacts related to adequate soils for the use of septic tanks or alternative <br />wastewater disposal systems because septic systems are not appropriate within urbanized areas. The Focused GPU <br />EIR concurred and found the impact to be less than significant. There would be no use of septic tanks or alternative <br />wastewater disposal systems for the Housing Component. No impact would occur. Because the Housing Component <br />would connect to the existing sewer system, this component is consistent with the analysis in the GPU EIR. It would <br />not create new impacts or increase impacts and there is no new information of substantial importance for CEQA. <br />f. The Focused GPU EIR stated that the Planning Area is not known to have paleontological resources but could <br />potentially contain previously undiscovered resources (p. 4.7-18). Regarding unique geological resources, the <br />Focused GPU EIR notes proposed development on previously undisturbed land that contains steep slopes, rocky <br />outcroppings, or unique geological features. These areas are more likely to contain isolated unique geologic features. <br />Proposed development in the Planning Area has the potential to destroy unique paleontological resources (p. 4.7-18). <br />The Focused GPU EIR discusses the existing measures and regulations that reduce potentially significant <br />paleontological resources impacts in the Planning Area. These include Redwood City’s Cultural Resources <br />Management Plan, which requires development proponents to consult with the Northwest Information Center <br />(NWIC), a standard City condition of approval requiring work stoppage in the even ground disturbing activities <br />identify paleontological resources, and the City’s standard procedures requiring a qualified paleontologist’s <br />assessment of the potential for development proposed to destroy paleontological resources prior to the issuance of <br />grading and demolition permits (p. 4.7-18). The Focused GPU EIR concluded the City’s established processes under <br />ATTY/RESO.0031/CC RESO CEQA GUIDELINES (901 EL CAMINO REAL) <br />REV: 04-22-25 VR <br /> <br />Page 69 of 148