Laserfiche WebLink
1. Upon the written request of the Developer, providing at <br />Developer’s sole cost and expense and subject to City’s ability to obtain such services, additional <br />staff and/or staff consultants for planning and processing of each pending Subsequent Approval <br />application (Developer shall pay such costs at cost plus ten percent (10%) for administrative costs <br />incurred); <br /> 2. If legally required, providing notice and holding public <br />hearings; and, <br /> 3. Acting on any such pending Subsequent Approval <br />application. <br /> C. Any subsequent discretionary action or discretionary approval <br />initiated by Developer that is not otherwise permitted by or contemplated in the Project Approvals <br />or which changes the uses, intensity, density, or building height or decreases the lot area, setbacks, <br />parking, or other entitlements permitted on the Property, except for Project Approval amendments <br />contemplated in Section 8.7, shall be subject to the rules, regulations, ordinances, and official <br />policies of the City then in effect at the time of application and City reserves full and complete <br />discretion with respect to any findings to be made in connection therewith. <br />Section 9.4 Other Agency Subsequent Approvals; Authority of City. Other public <br />agencies not within the control of City may possess authority to regulate aspects of the <br />development of the Property separately from or jointly with City, and this Agreement does not <br />limit the authority of such other public agencies on the Project (“Other Agency Subsequent <br />Approvals”). Nevertheless, City shall be bound by, and shall abide by, its covenants and <br />obligations under this Agreement in all respects when dealing with any such agency regarding the <br />Property. City shall cooperate with Developer, at Developer’s expense, to the extent appropriate <br />and as permitted by the Applicable City Regulations, in Developer’s efforts to obtain, as may be <br />required the Other Agency Subsequent Approvals. Nothing in this Section 9.4 shall relieve <br />Developer of its obligation to comply with the Project Approvals, notwithstanding any conflict <br />between the Other Agency Subsequent Approvals and the Project Approvals. Notwithstanding the <br />issuance to Developer of Other Agency Subsequent Approvals, Developer agrees that City may <br />reasonably review and comment upon any materials or applications associated with Other Agency <br />Subsequent Approvals to ensure consistency with the Project Approvals and Developer shall make <br />diligent good faith efforts to incorporate any and all changes requested by City prior to submitting <br />such materials and applications for review and/or approval to the other governmental or quasi- <br />governmental entities with jurisdiction over the Project. <br />Section 9.5 Revision to Project. In the event of a court order issued as a result of a <br />successful Litigation Challenge as defined in Section 12.3, City shall, to the extent permitted by <br />law or court order, in good faith seek to comply with the court order in such a manner as will <br />maintain the integrity of the Project Approvals, and in order to avoid or minimize to the greatest <br />extent possible any impact to the development of the Project as provided for in, and contemplated <br />by, the Project Approvals and this Agreement, or any conflict with the Project Approvals or this <br />Agreement or frustration of the intent or purpose of the Project Approvals or this Agreement. <br />ATTY/ORD.0002/CC ORD APPROVING DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT (901 EL CAMINO REAL) - EXHIBIT A <br />REV: 04-23-25 VR <br /> <br />Page 40 of 336