Laserfiche WebLink
6.1 B - Attachment No. 4 <br /> MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS <br /> Capital Outlay Fund-This fund accounts for resources provided to finance general governmental capital projects. <br /> In FY 2008/09, the capital outlay fund generated $1.3 million in revenue, most of which was from interest and <br /> intergovernmental grants. This fund was also the recipient of$8 million of transfers from the general fund. Total <br /> outlays were $13.3 million of which $8.4 million met with City's criteria for capitalization. The balance ($4.9 <br /> million)was expended in FY 2008/09. Total outlays in the prior year(FY 2007/08)were$12.9 million. All of the <br /> capital outlay fund's$22.4 million fund balance is reserved or designated for specific capital projects. <br /> Redevelopment Agency Fund - This fund accounts for resources provided to finance the City's Redevelopment <br /> Agency, a separate legal entity organized pursuant to the community redevelopment law of the Health and Safety <br /> Code of the State of California. The City Council also serves on the Board of Directors of the Redevelopment <br /> Agency. The Redevelopment Agency's fund balance increased by $.8 million primarily due to greater than <br /> anticipated property t�revenue in FY 2008/09. <br /> Proprietary Funds <br /> Enterprise fund net assets totaled $142.4 million at the end of the fiscal year, a decrease of$8.2 million over the <br /> prior year balance of$150.6 million. Enterprise operating revenues were $48 million this year, an increase of$2.4 <br /> million over last year,while net non-operating revenues(expenses)were $4.9 million compared to$2.7 million the <br /> prior year. Net non-operating revenues (expenses) experienced a$2.2 million change due to the FY 2008/09 $1.3 <br /> million increase in authority investment, combined with the FY 2008/09 increases in grant revenue of$.4 million <br /> and decrease in the interest expense of$.8 million. <br /> Enterprise fund operating expenses were$43 million this year,up$.5 million from the prior year,most of which <br /> was due to higher operating expenses in the parking and sewer utility funds. <br /> Water Utility - Net assets of the water utility fund increased $4.8 million in the current year to a total of$55.8 <br /> million. This increase resulted from increased operating revenues, increased grant revenue, and a decrease in <br /> expenses for water purchased from San Francisco Water Department as more water needs were met through use of <br /> recycled water. <br /> Sewer Utility - The sewer utility fund realized operating income of$2.7 million in the current yeax, up from the <br /> operating income of$1 million in the prior year. Revenues increased by $2.1 million while expenses increased <br /> $.366 million over the prior year due to increased costs associated with the Sanitary Sewer Management Plan <br /> mandate from the San Francisco Bay Regional Water Quality Control Board. <br /> Parking Fund - Operating revenues decreased by $258,000 this year to $.8 million, while operating expenses <br /> increased to $2.5 million, an increase of$.4 million due to the expanded parking program downtown, including <br /> increased costs associated with increased staffing related to downtown public safety. The general fund transferred <br /> $1.1 million into the parking fund to partially cover the operating deficit. <br /> Port Fund - Operating revenues were down 4.1% while operating expenses were down .9% from FY 2007/08. <br /> Interest income decreased 42% from $593,000 to $346,000. Overall, net assets decreased from $39 million to $23 <br /> million, or 42% as the Port experienced a $19.8 million extraordinary item for pollution remediation that had <br /> previously been capitalized. <br /> GENERAL FUND BUDGETARY HIGHLIGHTS <br /> Property t�es exceeded budget by $1.3 million primarily due to the receipt of a $3 million payment from the <br /> County of San Mateo due to the over-deduction of Education Revenue Augmentation Fund amounts from the City <br /> in prior years,which exceeded the estimated amount by$1.6 million. <br /> Sales and other taxes were less than budget by $3.2 million mostly due to an unanticipated decline in sales tax <br /> revenue ($3.8 million), transient occupancy t�es ($.8 million) and property transfer t� ($.3 million), offset by <br /> higher utility users' t�es($1.6 million). <br /> Licenses and permits were less than budget by$.5 million due to a decline in construction activity during the year. <br /> 10 <br />