AgdaPkt 2009-12-14 - Laserfiche WebLink

Browse Search

7C allocation; and (2} ail persons regardless of age in a# least the same praportion as the Page 4 number of low-income households with a member under age 65 years bears to the cent number of low-income househoids of #he community as reported in the most re census. As shown below, it is antic+pated that the Agency s expenditures will be in full comp(iance with the CRL's targeting requirements. � IUliriimum Requirement Anticipated�A�ge�c��e4 ormance �.._�__..—�--- 0 Ve Low {ncome At least 39%of Ex enditures �6 a At least 67% 79% Ve Low+ Low Income _ o Maderate Income No more than 33% �� 0 Non-senior ro'ects At least 71% 80% Comments of� Planning Commission and Housing and Numan Concerns Committee (HHCC} The Planning Commission and HHCC reviewed the draft Implementa#ion P1an at a �es� meeting on December 1. Review by the Planning Commission and HHCC �s A�e c to and "approval" is not required under CRL. It has been the pol�cy of the g y consider and incorporate, as appropriate, their commen#s. The Planning Commissian and HHCC had several questions on such top�i� a Iow income housing projects; . A r t i c l e 3 4, w h i c h r e q u i r e s v o t e r a p p r o v a . t h e r o l e o f t h e C h a m b e r o f C ommerce in economic devefopment activities; . the consistency of the language rela#ed to the consideration of inclusionary affordable housing units outside ofi#he Projec# Area as described in the Housing Element; . tne use of set-aside monies#o fund expired affardability covenants; efficienc in . the use of RDA funds for improvements reiated to improving energy Y units; . the ability to land assemble for both housing and non-housing projects and activities; and . the impact of the Sta#e "SERAF" take-aways. AIE of the uestions were answered satisfactorify. Minor edits were made to s hn q ara raph in the Implementation Pian refated to the inclus�on vf affordable unit p 9 P rojects to be built autside of the Project Area, consistent with the Housing Elemen . The consistency of the Implementation Plan with the new Generaf Plan was a{so conf rmed. Staff and KMA paid special attention to reviewing all the app��p��e chapters and elements o� the new General Plan to �nsure cons�stency, i�c u g Nousing Eiement and #he Economic Deveiopment and the Urban Form and Land Use Chapters of the Bui1t Environment Element. Notification Pursuant to Section 3349� (d) of CRL, notice of the public hearing was publissen consistent with Section 6063 of the Government Code, ma�led at ieast three v►►a��east advance to all persons and agencies that have requested notice, and paS�eP blication, four permanent places within the project area for a per�od of three W oe the date of fihe mailing, and posting were completed not less than 1 Q days prfor t hearing.