Laserfiche WebLink
City of Redwood City (0011239.02)2-1 Woodard & Curran, Inc. <br />Sanitary Sewer Capacity Master Plan November 2023 <br />2.HYDRAULIC MODEL DEVELOPMENT AND CALIBRATION <br />This chapter documents the development of the hydraulic model that was used to assess the capacity of the City’s sewer <br />system. The chapter provides an overview of the model development process, including descriptions of the modeled <br />sewer network, the flow monitoring program conducted for this study and the basis for estimating wastewater flows, and <br />the calibration of the model. A detailed description of how the model was developed is provided in the Model <br />Development Technical Memorandum (TM) in Appendix A. This chapter summarizes the information presented in the <br />TM. <br />Woodard & Curran developed the model in InfoWorks™ ICM, a fully dynamic hydraulic modeling software supported by <br />a GIS-based modeling interface. <br />2.1 MODELED SYSTEM <br />The City’s sanitary sewer model is divided into three separate networks: the Main City Area, Seaport/Pacific Shores, <br />and Redwood Shores. The model networks include all City pipes but exclude private, Port of Redwood City, and County- <br />owned facilities (except a few cases where County pipes are connected both upstream and downstream with the City’s <br />system). In total, the networks include about 194 miles of pipelines (183 miles of City gravity mains and 11 miles of force <br />mains) and 31 pump stations and lift stations (both types are referred to as pump stations in this report). The model <br />networks comprise all City-owned sewers, as described in Chapter 1 and shown in Figure 1-2 and Figure 1-3. Schematic <br />diagrams of the pump stations in the Seaport/Pacific Shores and Redwood Shores networks are presented in Figure <br />2-1 and Figure 2-2, respectively. <br />The data used to create the model networks were provided by the City as GIS files of sewer system pipes, manholes <br />and other structures. The model construction and validation process included the following: <br />•The modeled network was checked for connectivity, i.e., verifying that the correct upstream/downstream <br />manholes were identified for each pipe and that there were no missing links in the network. <br />•Manhole and pipeline network data, including rim and invert elevations and pipeline sizes and lengths, were <br />verified and refined where needed based on information from record drawings, previous master plan models, <br />field verification of flow split locations provided by the City, and County LiDAR ground model data. Note that <br />the Main City Area model network includes over 200 potential flow split locations (manholes that have more <br />than one outlet pipe, creating alternate downstream flow paths depending on hydraulic conditions and physical <br />configuration). Verification of outlet pipe invert elevations at key flow splits was important for model accuracy. <br />•The model software was used to generate profiles of pipe reaches to visually check for missing or suspect <br />data. These profiles were also used to identify potential datum differences in source data. Adjustments were <br />made to bring all model data to a common datum. In the Main City Area, the datum used for this study was <br />Redwood City’s “old” (pre-2008) datum (represented as being equal to NGVD29 – 2.56 feet), since most of the <br />GIS data are based on that datum. However, in the future the City plans to convert the model to the City’s <br />current official datum, NAVD88. <br />•All pipelines were initially assigned a Manning’s n of 0.013, which is standard practice for master planning-level <br />modeling analyses. <br />•The sources of model data (e.g., GIS, record drawings, field verification, datum adjustment, inference, etc.) <br />were documented using “flags” in the model database. <br />ATTY/RESO.0077/CC RESO SEWER SYSTEM MANAGEMENT PLAN - EXHIBIT A <br />REV: 07-14-25 LF <br /> <br />Page 117 of 317