My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Browse
Search
Reso25 16341
RedwoodCity
>
City Clerk
>
Resolutions
>
City Council
>
2020-2029
>
2025
>
Reso25 16341
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/22/2025 1:50:17 PM
Creation date
7/22/2025 1:47:45 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CC Index
CC Index - Document Type
Resolution
Meeting Type
Regular
Agency Type
City Council
Date
7/21/2025
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
320
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Capacity and I/I Assessment <br />City of Redwood City (0011239.02)3-3 Woodard & Curran, Inc. <br />Sanitary Sewer Capacity Master Plan November 2023 <br />For Redwood City, since the design storm PWWF represents an infrequent, 10-year return period event coinciding with <br />a conservative BWF condition, the Master Plan considers it acceptable to allow surcharging over the pipe crown, <br />provided the hydraulic grade line (water level) remains at least 5 feet below the ground surface. (However, <br />improvements, if needed, would be sized in accordance with the City’s design criteria, as noted below.) Under peak dry <br />weather conditions, however, sewers should be able to convey the peak flow without surcharge. <br />Note that the Master Plan capacity criterion of 5 feet minimum freeboard is less conservative than the maximum flow <br />depth to diameter (d/D) of 0.75 specified in the City’s design standards. However, new development projects may still <br />be required to provide site-specific analysis, which will be based on a capacity criterion on 0.75 d/D per City policy. <br />Performance criteria for pump stations are based on their firm capacity, defined as pumping capacity with the largest <br />pumping unit out of service. Force mains are considered to be capacity deficient if maximum velocity exceeds 8 feet per <br />second (fps) under design peak wet weather flow. Maximum velocity criteria are intended to avoid excessive head <br />losses in the force main. <br />3.1.3 Design Criteria for New Facilities <br />The following criteria were used for sizing new gravity sewers for the Master Plan where needed to relieve identified <br />capacity deficiencies. These criteria are based on the modeled design storm PWWF in the system. <br />•Maximum allowable flow depth-to-diameter ratio (d/D) of 0.75 under peak design flow for all pipe diameters <br />•Manning ‘n’ of 0.013 for all pipe materials <br />•Downstream pipes at least as large as upstream pipes for new or replacement sewers where practical <br />Criteria recommended for force mains include: <br />•Minimum and maximum velocities of 3 and 8 fps, respectively <br />Additional design criteria are noted in the Design Flow and Hydraulic Criteria TM in Appendix B. <br />Pump stations should be designed to have firm capacity to handle the design PWWF. These criteria are considered <br />appropriate, as long as the pump station design accounts for pumping efficiency under both existing and future dry <br />weather flow conditions, “normal” wet weather conditions, and phasing in determining the number and size of pumps. <br />3.2 CAPACITY ANALYSIS RESULTS <br />The calibrated model was run for existing and future conditions to identify areas of the system that fail to meet the <br />specified performance criteria under design storm peak wet weather flows. No capacity deficiencies in the system were <br />identified for dry weather conditions. <br />3.2.1 Gravity Sewer System Capacity Deficiencies <br />The PWWF model results in the Main City Area are shown in Figure 3-2 for existing conditions and in Figure 3-3 for <br />future conditions (see description of flow scenarios in Section 2.3.2). The figures show pipes that would be surcharged <br />due to insufficient capacity (“throttle” conditions) as well as upstream segments that would be surcharged due to <br />backwater, where the deficiency would result in either predicted overflows or surcharge to within less than 5 feet of the <br />manhole rims. Most of the capacity deficiencies in the system are a result of existing wet weather flows; however, future <br />development, particularly in the Downtown area, would increase the level of surcharge in some of the sewers. <br />There were no gravity sewer capacity deficiencies indicated for the Seaport/Pacific Shores system, and only one small <br />area in Redwood Shores, downstream of PS No. 09. Flow monitoring indicated extremely high peak flows in the area <br />tributary to that pump station. <br />ATTY/RESO.0077/CC RESO SEWER SYSTEM MANAGEMENT PLAN - EXHIBIT A <br />REV: 07-14-25 LF <br /> <br />Page 138 of 317
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.