My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Browse
Search
Reso25 16341
RedwoodCity
>
City Clerk
>
Resolutions
>
City Council
>
2020-2029
>
2025
>
Reso25 16341
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/22/2025 1:50:17 PM
Creation date
7/22/2025 1:47:45 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CC Index
CC Index - Document Type
Resolution
Meeting Type
Regular
Agency Type
City Council
Date
7/21/2025
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
320
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Recommended Capacity Improvement Plan <br />City of Redwood City (0011239.02)4-7 Woodard & Curran, Inc. <br />Sanitary Sewer Capacity Master Plan November 2023 <br />•Flow or project verification. As documented in Table 4-1, some of the capacity projects identified either had <br />no flow meter specifically along the deficient reach to directly confirm the flow, or the model results indicated <br />surcharging that has not been visually observed in the system. In these cases, the City may wish to conduct <br />additional investigation to further verify the project need and sizing. Verification could be conducted by <br />temporary flow or surcharge monitoring during wet weather periods. <br />•Assessment of rehabilitation effectiveness. If the City conducts extensive repairs and rehabilitation within <br />a relatively small area with a well-defined drainage area, conducting flow monitoring both before and after the <br />rehabilitation efforts could provide valuable insight into how effective the rehabilitation has been in reducing <br />RDI/I. If rehabilitation efforts are less concentrated, however, with work in various areas around the City, or if <br />the drainage area is not well defined, with potential flow splits affecting flow coming into the basin, limited <br />monitoring to try to assess rehabilitation effectiveness is not likely to be informative. In this scenario, the City <br />would be better served by conducting periodic system-wide flow monitoring (perhaps every five years) in <br />conjunction with a model calibration update to update RDI/I parameters. <br />•Confirmation of flow prior to major developments. On occasion, it may be appropriate for the City to <br />conduct temporary monitoring to verify flows in a pipe that is expected to be affected by a major development. <br />Such monitoring is typically brief (2 to 3 weeks) and focused on dry weather capacity. <br />•Model calibration update. The City will be relying on the new, all-pipe model developed for this Master Plan <br />for a number of purposes. Periodically updating the model loads and the model calibration as populations and <br />businesses change and as the City’s rehabilitation and repair efforts continue will be important for the model <br />to continue to be useful in the future. For the purpose of keeping the model up-to-date, periodic system-wide <br />flow monitoring is far more effective and provides a much sounder basis for updating the model calibration than <br />limited annual monitoring. <br />In selecting appropriate flow monitoring locations, both the accuracy of the collected data and the purpose of the <br />monitoring need to be considered. For data accuracy, the best sites will have good hydraulics and be easily accessible <br />(to facilitate field calibration and checking of meters). Although it is not always possible depending on the goals of the <br />flow monitoring program, for the most accurate flow readings sites should generally avoid locations with sharp changes <br />in pipe alignment or flow direction (such as 90-degree bends); manholes likely to have turbulent flow due to drops or <br />junctions with multiple pipes; manholes with significant changes in pipe slope between the incoming and outgoing pipes; <br />very shallow flow (e.g., less than 2 inches); very slow or very fast flow (less than 1 fps or more than 5 fps); backwater or <br />surcharged conditions; sites impacted by backup or discharge from a pump station; and sites that experience significant <br />grease, silt, sediment, or debris buildup. <br />An effective approach to select sites with the best hydraulics possible is to first identify where sites are needed to serve <br />the intended purpose of monitoring. Then review the sewer network data in the vicinity to identify what appears to be <br />the best specific manhole for metering, but also determine how far upstream or downstream of this site the meter could <br />be installed and still capture the flow intended. This way, if the selected site does not look ideal upon site investigation, <br />the flow monitoring contractor can further investigate upstream or downstream to identify a manhole that would provide <br />more suitable hydraulic conditions. <br />Any flow monitoring conducted during wet weather needs reliable rainfall data to be useful. If there are no local, reliable <br />rain gauges available, temporary rain gauge(s) should be installed as part of the flow monitoring program. <br />ATTY/RESO.0077/CC RESO SEWER SYSTEM MANAGEMENT PLAN - EXHIBIT A <br />REV: 07-14-25 LF <br /> <br />Page 161 of 317
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.