Reso25 16349 - Laserfiche WebLink

Browse Search

Tier 2 Allocation Model Agency Alameda CWD Brisbane Burlingame Coastside CWS - Total Daly City East Palo Alto Estero Hayward Hillsborough Menlo Park Mid-Peninsula Millbrae Milpitas Mountain View North Coast Palo Alto Purissima Hills Redwood City San Bruno San Jose Santa Clara Stanford Sunnyvale Westborough Total Allocated Unallocated Reserved                          2. Non-Residential Base Allocation 3. SFPUC Maximum Cutback "Reserve"4. Seasonal Allocation 5. Base SFPUC Purchases/ISG-Based Allocation with Minimum Cutback Estimated % Indoor Use % Non- Residential Use Non- Residential Base Allocation (mgd) 2. Non- Residential Base Allocation (mgd) SFPUC Maximum Cutback (mgd)2 Does Step 2 Allocation Meet SFPUC Maximum Cutback? SFPUC Maximum Cutback Shortfall (mgd) % Seasonal Use Seasonal SFPUC Purchases (mgd) Seasonal Allocation (mgd) 4. Seasonal Allocation (mgd) Weighted Average of Base Period SFPUC Purchases (up to ISG) and ISG (mgd) Weighted Share of Tier 1 Allocation (mgd) Lesser of Weighted Share and Minimum Cutback Allocation (i.e., Target Allocation) Target Allocation Based Gap (mgd) Target Based Allocation 1 (mgd) 69%41%2.22 5.77 6.69 0.92 31%2.71 0.22 5.99 10.33 7.68 7.68 1.69 0.31 66%68%0.27 0.50 0.50 0.01 34%0.22 0.02 0.51 0.76 0.56 0.56 0.05 0.01 73%40%0.93 2.39 2.67 0.28 27%0.93 0.07 2.46 4.04 3.00 3.00 0.54 0.10 64%46%0.47 1.30 1.31 0.01 36%0.60 0.05 1.35 1.85 1.38 1.38 0.03 0.01 61%30%5.02 16.80 22.66 5.85 39%11.26 0.89 17.69 31.36 23.32 23.32 5.62 1.05 88%23%0.73 3.64 2.97 0.00 12%0.46 0.04 3.64 3.99 2.96 2.96 0.00 0.00 79%18%0.21 1.49 1.21 0.00 21%0.33 0.03 1.49 2.19 1.63 1.49 0.00 0.00 63%45%1.13 2.89 3.35 0.46 37%1.58 0.13 3.01 4.84 3.60 3.60 0.59 0.11 72%45%4.33 11.85 11.06 0.00 28%3.95 0.31 12.16 16.85 12.53 12.53 0.37 0.07 36%9%0.08 0.62 2.06 1.44 64%1.70 0.14 0.76 3.13 2.33 2.33 1.57 0.29 53%63%0.94 1.90 2.40 0.50 47%1.47 0.12 2.01 3.54 2.63 2.63 0.62 0.12 68%27%0.45 1.87 2.04 0.18 32%0.86 0.07 1.93 3.05 2.27 2.27 0.33 0.06 76%36%0.49 1.46 1.49 0.03 24%0.46 0.04 1.49 2.33 1.73 1.73 0.24 0.04 78%51%2.08 4.62 4.40 0.00 22%1.23 0.10 4.72 6.85 5.09 5.09 0.37 0.07 66%43%2.04 5.39 6.03 0.65 34%2.64 0.21 5.60 9.33 6.94 6.94 1.34 0.25 80%24%0.42 2.16 1.85 0.00 20%0.48 0.04 2.20 2.87 2.13 2.13 0.00 0.00 61%38%2.11 5.34 7.71 2.37 39%3.90 0.31 5.65 12.14 9.03 9.03 3.38 0.63 38%12%0.07 0.42 1.26 0.84 62%1.13 0.09 0.51 1.62 1.21 1.21 0.70 0.13 68%34%1.81 6.08 6.68 0.60 32%2.80 0.22 6.31 9.38 6.98 6.98 0.67 0.13 78%29%0.20 0.82 0.72 0.00 22%0.21 0.02 0.84 1.70 1.26 0.89 0.05 0.01 69%62%1.68 3.69 3.31 0.00 31%1.33 0.11 3.79 4.34 3.23 3.23 0.00 0.00 73%50%1.10 2.35 2.52 0.17 27%0.88 0.07 2.42 3.66 2.72 2.72 0.31 0.06 63%45%0.38 1.32 1.11 0.00 37%0.53 0.04 1.36 1.96 1.46 1.36 0.00 0.00 69%42%2.54 6.48 7.34 0.86 31%2.98 0.24 6.71 10.49 7.80 7.80 1.09 0.20 73%26%0.14 0.76 0.62 0.00 27%0.22 0.02 0.76 0.97 0.72 0.72 0.00 0.00 31.83 91.90 103.98 15.18 44.87 3.56 95.38 153.57 114.20 113.58 19.56 3.64 91.90 91.90 95.38 22.30 22.30 18.82 0 15.18 15.18 No water is allocatied in this step Establishes the lower limit of an agency's final allocation and potential need is reserved for Step 5 Basis for Target Allocation (SFPUC Purchases / ISG weighting from OVERVIEW tab) Target Allocation First Iteration of Base Per Allocation Page 17 of 19 ATTY/RESO.0092/CC RESO APPROVING TIER 2 DROUGHT RESPONSE IMPLEMENTATION PLAN (WATER SUPPLY AGREEMENT) - EXHIBIT A REV: 08-18-25 MI Page 19 of 21