My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Browse
Search
Reso25 16368
RedwoodCity
>
City Clerk
>
Resolutions
>
City Council
>
2020-2029
>
2025
>
Reso25 16368
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/12/2025 9:44:34 AM
Creation date
11/12/2025 9:43:36 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CC Index
CC Index - Document Type
Resolution
Meeting Type
Regular
Agency Type
City Council
Date
11/10/2025
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
184
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br /> <br />Water Rate Cost-of-Service Study <br />Section 4. Cost-of-Service Analysis <br /> <br /> <br />HF&H Consultants, LLC | July 8, 2025 | Page 23 of 53 <br />Section 4. Cost-of-Service Analysis <br />GENERAL APPROACH <br />The revenue requirement analysis determines the total amount of revenue that must be <br />recovered from rates. The next step in the process is the cost-of-service analysis, which <br />ensures that costs are proportionally allocated to customers based on how they use the <br />system. <br />Previous rate studies employed a tiered rate structure or the AWWA “base/extra capacity” <br />method that allocates costs based on average day, maximum day, and maximum hour <br />demands. Instead, the methodology has been refined to support a uniform volumetric rate, <br />aligning cost allocations with the actual services provided. This change was made, in part, to <br />respond to recent California Court of Appeal decisions regarding the requirements for <br />property-related fees, which must be justified based on demonstrated costs of service <br />pursuant to Proposition 218. <br />Costs are now allocated across four primary service components: <br /> Demand-related costs, representing general water use across the customer base. <br /> Customer service costs, associated with billing, meter reading, and account <br />management. <br /> Capacity-related costs, which reflect the infrastructure required to meet system-wide <br />needs. <br /> Fire protection costs, allocated separately to public and private fire service <br />requirements. <br />This approach allows for a simplified rate structure, with costs distributed evenly across all <br />units of water consumption, rather than segmented by usage tiers. By aligning cost allocations <br />with the services delivered and the infrastructure required to support them, the uniform rate <br />structure ensures that rates are equitable and compliant with cost-of-service principles. <br />CUSTOMER CLASSES <br />The cost-of-service analysis distributes the revenue requirements among customer classes in <br />proportion to their service requirements. There is no industry standard that specifies which <br />customer classes should be used. The law allows utilities to exercise discretion in determining <br />the appropriate customer classes provided the rates yield charges that are proportional to the <br />cost of providing service for each category. <br />The City currently has multiple customer classes: Single Family Residential and Non- <br />Residential. Non-Residential includes multi family residential dwellings, and commercial, <br />municipal, institutional, industrial, and irrigation customers. All these customers pay the same <br />per unit of water use and are grouped into one class. These classes were last reviewed as <br />part of the previous cost-of-service study in 2022. <br />The contrast in customer classes stems from the typical pattern of usage by each class. <br />Residential use varies according to indoor and outdoor needs throughout the year, producing <br />ATTY/RESO.0109/CC RESO WATER RATES - EXHIBIT A <br />REV: 11-05-25 MI
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.