My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Browse
Search
2025.11.10 Speaker Card - PC
RedwoodCity
>
City Clerk
>
Agenda Packets
>
2020-2029
>
2025
>
Speaker Cards - Public Comments
>
2025.11.10 Speaker Card - PC
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/12/2025 10:47:16 AM
Creation date
11/12/2025 10:46:46 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CC Index
CC Index - Document Type
Speaker Card
Meeting Type
Regular
Agency Type
City Council
Date
11/10/2025
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
89
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
These increases are compounded by the rising cost of water usage itself. The proposal seeks to <br />eliminate the current tiered rate structure, which encourages conservation by charging a higher <br />price for excessive water use. Instead, a uniform rate will be applied to all customers, starting at <br />$9.18 per hundred cubic feet (HCF) in 2026 and rising to $10.22 by 2028. This change removes <br />a critical incentive for residents to conserve water, a precious resource in our state. <br />Elimination of Conservation Incentives <br />The current tiered rate structure for single-family residential customers is a proven method for <br />encouraging water conservation. By charging progressively higher rates for higher levels of <br />water consumption, the city sends a clear price signal to residents to use water wisely. The <br />proposed elimination of this structure in favor of a flat rate is a significant step backward in our <br />collective efforts to promote sustainability and responsible water management. <br /> <br />This change is particularly concerning given the ongoing challenges of drought and water <br />scarcity in California. At a time when we should be doubling down on conservation efforts, this <br />proposal removes a key tool for achieving that goal. It sends the wrong message to residents <br />and undermines the city's stated commitment to environmental stewardship. <br />Disproportionate Impact on Fixed-Income Residents <br />The proposed water rate increases will not affect all residents equally. For seniors, retirees, and <br />other individuals living on fixed incomes, these hikes represent a significant and potentially <br />insurmountable financial burden. This is not just an inconvenience; it is a threat to their ability to <br />afford basic necessities and remain in their homes. <br />The Compounding Crisis of Utility Costs <br />It is crucial to understand that this water rate increase is not happening in a vacuum. It is the <br />latest in a series of relentless utility rate hikes across San Mateo County. Residents are already <br />grappling with rising costs for electricity, gas, and sewer services. For those on a fixed income, <br />each new increase chips away at an already limited budget, forcing difficult choices between <br />paying for utilities, food, or medication. <br /> <br />Recent data from across the Bay Area paints a stark picture of this affordability crisis. Utility bills <br />have increased by over 20% in the region, and water rates in some parts of California are <br />projected to rise by as much as 70% in the coming years. This trend is unsustainable and <br />places an unconscionable burden on our most vulnerable residents. <br />The Unique Vulnerability of Seniors <br />Seniors are particularly vulnerable to these increases. Many live on fixed incomes from <br />pensions, Social Security, or limited savings, which do not keep pace with inflation or the rising <br />cost of living. A 2023 study found that energy costs alone can consume as much as 37% of the
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.