My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Browse
Search
Reso25-04 0085 PC - Reso Recommending Affordable Housing Incentive Program Approval
RedwoodCity
>
City Clerk
>
Resolutions
>
Planning Commission
>
2025
>
Reso25-04 0085 PC - Reso Recommending Affordable Housing Incentive Program Approval
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/6/2026 3:45:10 PM
Creation date
1/6/2026 3:45:07 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CC Index
CC Index - Document Type
Resolution
Meeting Type
Regular
Agency Type
Planning Commission
Date
8/19/2025
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
10
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
ATTY/RESO.0085/PC RESO RECOMMENDING AFFORDABLE HOUSING INCENTIVE PROGRAM APPROVAL – EXHIBIT A <br />REV: 08-14-25 VR <br />Page 1 of 6 <br />ORDINANCE NO.______ <br />AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF REDWOOD <br />CITY TEMPORARILY AMENDING ARTICLE 29 (REQUIREMENTS FOR <br />AFFORDABLE HOUSING) OF THE ZONING CODE OF REDWOOD CITY <br />BY REDUCING AFFORDABLE HOUSING REQUIREMENTS FOR <br />PIPELINE PROJECTS (AFFORDABLE HOUSING INCENTIVE <br />PROGRAM) <br />WHEREAS, the City of Redwood City (“City”) is experiencing a housing crisis. <br />California has one of the most expensive housing markets and one of the highest rates <br />of homelessness in the nation. The City Council has adopted Article 29 of the Redwood <br />City Zoning Code (Requirements for Affordable Housing) (hereinafter referred to as the <br />“Affordable Housing Ordinance” or “AHO”) in 2018, which was updated in 2021 and 2023, <br />in recognition of the fact that the number of homes affordable to lower income households <br />is significantly lower than the proportion of lower income households in Redwood City <br />and that housing production has not kept up with employment growth. The AHO’s <br />purpose is to increase the supply of affordable housing by imposing inclusionary <br />requirements for residential developers to help meet the needs of all community members <br />and maintain a jobs/housing balance; and <br />WHEREAS, addressing the housing crisis requires a broad spectrum of land use <br />and financing tools. For example, the Legislature has adopted State Density Bonus Law <br />to address the financing gap by allowing a developer to include more total units in a <br />project than would otherwise be allowed by the local zoning ordinance in exchange for <br />affordable units. Inclusionary housing programs, the AHO, have been another useful tool <br />in creating below-market rate affordable housing in Redwood City. The City relied on <br />nexus studies evaluating residential impact fees and commercial linkage fees to establish <br />the AHO’s requirements and has recently initiated an effort to conduct updated studies. <br />Since the adoption of this program, the inclusionary housing requirements have been set <br />at various levels in response to changing economic conditions. Generally, the goal of the <br />AHO is to set the inclusionary housing requirements at the maximum economically <br />feasible amount for market rate housing that is within the range of and legally justified by <br />the City’s adopted nexus studies; and <br />WHEREAS, City staff has identified that certain residential projects have received <br />their land use planning approvals but have not pulled any building permits to begin <br />construction (defined below as “Pipeline Projects”). The applicants for these Pipeline <br />Projects have raised concerns that interest rates, capitalization rates, land prices, <br />construction costs, affordable housing requirements, and rents/sale prices have indicated <br />that the projects are not financially feasible. Because these projects are typical of most <br />of the housing production in Redwood City, this suggests that residential development <br />more broadly is not financially feasible under current economic conditions. Economic <br />conditions that render residential development infeasible threaten several important <br />policy priorities of the City, including expansion of the City’s housing supply, the <br />EXHIBIT A
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.