My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Browse
Search
Agda Pkt 2026.01.26 Joint SA PFA
RedwoodCity
>
City Clerk
>
Agenda Packets
>
2020-2029
>
2026
>
Agda Pkt 2026.01.26 Joint SA PFA
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/27/2026 11:37:07 AM
Creation date
1/27/2026 11:34:59 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CC Index
CC Index - Document Type
Agenda Packet
Date
1/26/2026
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
372
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
ExcellentGoodFairPoorOverall confidence in Redwood Citygovernment, 2025GovernanceStrong local governments deliver results that meetresidents’ needs, use resources effectively, andrespond to both current and future communitypriorities. <br />10. Comparison to the national benchmark is shown. If no comparison is available, this is left blank. <br />11.Comparison to the custom benchmark is shown. A description of the custom benchmark cohort can be found in the About section of the report. <br />If no comparison is available, this is left blank. <br />-1 0 1 2 <br />The value of services for the taxes paid toRedwood CityThe overall direction that Redwood City istakingThe job Redwood City government does atwelcoming resident involvementOverall confidence in Redwood CitygovernmentGenerally acting in the best interest of thecommunityBeing honest <br />Being open and transparent to the public <br />Informing residents about issues facing the <br />community <br />Treating all residents fairly <br />Treating residents with respect <br />Similar SimilarSimilarSimilar <br />Similar SimilarSimilarSimilar <br />Similar SimilarSimilarSimilar <br />Similar SimilarSimilarSimilar <br />46%↗46% <br />5599%% <br />↗ <br />42% <br />54% <br />↗42% <br />54% <br />↗ <br />58%62%58%62% <br />63%63%63%63% <br />Please rate the following categories of Redwood City government performance.(% excellent or good)Public information servicesOverall customer service by Redwood CityemployeesPlease rate the quality of each of the following services in Redwood City.(% excellent or good) <br />2024 2025 <br />-1 0 1 2 <br />-1 0 1 2 <br />Redwood City <br />The Federal Government <br />Similar SimilarSimilarSimilar <br />Similar SimilarSimilarSimilar <br />64%73% <br />↗ <br />64%73% <br />↗ <br />33%26%33%26% <br />Overall, how would you rate the quality of the services provided by each of the following? <br />(% excellent or good) <br />2024 2025 -1 0 1 2 <br />-1 0 1 2 <br />Attended a local public meeting <br />Contacted Redwood City elected officials to <br />express your opinion <br />Contacted Redwood City for help or <br />information <br />Watched a local public meeting <br />Similar SimilarSimilarSimilar <br />Similar SimilarSimilarSimilar <br />Similar SimilarSimilarSimilar <br />Similar SimilarSimilarSimilar <br />18%20%18%20% <br />14%16%14%16% <br />43%46%43%46% <br />12% <br />23% <br />↗12% <br />23% <br />↗ <br />Please indicate whether or not you have done each of the following in the last 12 months. <br />(% yes) <br />vs. nationalbenchmark¹⁰vs. custombenchmark ¹¹ <br />11 <br />11.A. - Page 20 of 43 <br />154
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.