My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Browse
Search
Agmt25 El Camino Real Holding JV LLC, - 920 Shasta
RedwoodCity
>
City Clerk
>
Agreements
>
2020-2029
>
2025
>
Agmt25 El Camino Real Holding JV LLC, - 920 Shasta
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/13/2026 10:12:12 AM
Creation date
3/13/2026 10:11:06 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Agreement
PROJECT NAME
920 Shasta Affordable Housing Land Donation Agreement
RMP File Number
304
Date
12/5/2025
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
239
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
22206 920 Shasta <br />Affordable Housing Plan and Density Bonus Request <br />November 5, 2024 <br />ATTY/AGR/2025.084/920 SHASTA AFFORDABLE HOUSING LAND DONATION AGREEMENT <br />REV: 10-16-25 VR <br />Exhibit B-1 - 10 <br /> <br />- <br />income housing tax credits and tax- <br />Affordable Housing and Sustainable Communities (“AHSC”) program, State tax <br />credits, a conven <br />the developer of the proposed commercial project at 901 El Camino Real. <br /> <br />Housing Element, general plan, and zoning, and will not cause residential segregation; and <br />on for the site. <br />Please note that under Government Code Section 65583.2(a) the site inventory included in <br />the recently adopted Housing Element was to identify “land suitable for residential <br />development…” “… that can be developed for housing within the planning period.” The <br />inventory included in the adopted Housing Element includes “… land suitable and <br />available for residential development, including vacant sites and sites having realistic and <br />demonstrated potential for redevelopment during the planning period to meet the locality’s <br />housing need…” Government Code Section 65583(a)(3). Please note that the Housing <br />using. See Government <br />65583(a)(3), and that there would be no residential segregation as a result of introducing <br />100 new dwelling units in compliance with Fair Housing laws, the Project would not cause <br />residential segregation. <br />Since the City has adopted the Housing Element and included all 100 dwelling units in the <br />site inventory list, the City has already made the determination that the proposed location <br />nt. The Project <br />would be consistent with the General Plan land use designation of Mixed-Use Transition. <br />Because the law requires the General Plan to be internally consistent, and the Housing <br />Element was just adopted, other elements of the General Plan cannot be inconsistent with <br />the Housing Element. Therefore, the Project is consistent with the General Plan. The <br />zoning for the site is MUT-S and the Project would be consistent with that designation. To <br />the extent that one could potentially make an argument that the Project would not be <br />consistent with the General Plan or zoning, receipt of a density bonus or incentives do not <br />make the Project inconsistent. See Government Code Sections 65915(d)(5) and (j)(1). <br />Please see response #4 above, to summarize, the Applicant is requesting the land donation <br />option.
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.