Laserfiche WebLink
development of the Property separately from or jointly with City, and this Agreement does not <br />limit the authority of such other public agencies. Developer shall, at the time required by Developer <br />in accordance with Developer's construction schedule, apply for all such other permits and <br />approvals as may be lawfully required by other governmental or quasi -governmental entities in <br />connection with the development of, or the provision of services to, the Project. Developer shall <br />also pay all lawfully required fees when due to such public agencies. Developer acknowledges that <br />City does not control the amount of any such fees. City shall reasonably cooperate with Developer <br />in Developer's effort to obtain such permits and approvals; provided, however, City shall have no <br />obligation to incur any costs, without compensation or reimbursement by Developer, or to amend <br />any policy, regulation, or ordinance of City in connection therewith. <br />Section 4.5 Life of Project Approvals; VTPM Conflicts. The term of any and all Project <br />Approvals shall automatically be extended for the longer of the Term of this Agreement or the <br />term otherwise applicable to such Project Approvals. The Parties acknowledge that the Developer <br />has received a VTPM for the Project that vests certain rights under the Subdivision Map Act. The <br />Parties agree that in the event of any conflict between the provisions of this Agreement and the <br />VTPM, this Agreement shall control. If this Agreement expires or is earlier terminated in <br />accordance with its terms, the VTPM shall remain in effect for its remaining life, if any, in <br />accordance with the Subdivision Map Act; provided, however, the Parties agree that the vested <br />elements of the VTPM shall have no further force or effect following such expiration or earlier <br />termination of this Agreement. The Parties' agreements in the foregoing sentence shall survive the <br />expiration or earlier termination of this Agreement. <br />Section 4.6 Initiatives. If any New City Laws are enacted or imposed by a citizen - <br />sponsored initiative or referendum, which New City Laws would conflict with the Project <br />Approvals or this Agreement or reduce the development rights or assurances provided by this <br />Agreement, such New City Laws shall not apply to the Property or Project; provided, however, <br />the Parties acknowledge that City's approval of this Agreement is a legislative action subject to <br />referendum. Without limiting the generality of the foregoing, no moratorium or other limitation <br />(whether relating to the rate, timing, phasing or sequencing of development) affecting subdivision <br />maps, use permits, building permits, or other entitlements to use that are approved or to be <br />approved, issued, or granted by City shall apply to the Property or Project. Developer agrees and <br />understands that City does not have authority or jurisdiction over any other public agency's ability <br />to grant governmental approvals or permits or to impose a moratorium or other limitation that may <br />affect the Project. City shall reasonably cooperate with Developer and, at Developer's expense, <br />shall undertake such actions as may be necessary to ensure that this Agreement remains in full <br />force and effect. City, except to submit to vote of the electorate initiatives and referendums <br />required by Applicable City Regulation to be placed on a ballot and fulfill any legal responsibility <br />to defend a ballot measure passed by its voters, shall not support, adopt, or enact any New City <br />Law, or take any other action which would violate the express provisions or spirit and intent of <br />this Agreement. <br />Section 4.7 Timing of Develo np Hent. Except as otherwise provided for in the Project <br />Approvals and this Agreement, Developer shall have the vested right to develop the Project in such <br />order, at such rate, and at such times as Developer deems appropriate in the exercise of its business <br />judgment. In particular, and not in any limitation of any of the foregoing, since the California <br />Supreme Court held in Pardee Construction Co. v. City of'Camarillo, 37 Cal.3d 465 (1984), that <br />ATTY/AGR/2025.085 — 901 EL CAM IND REAL DA <br />REV: 08-01-25 VR <br />Page 22 of 48 <br />