Laserfiche WebLink
Page 7 of 8 <br />City of Redwood City 1017 Middlefield Road, Redwood City, CA. 94063 Tel: 650-780-7000 www.redwoodcity.org <br />(January 2023-January 2031), Redwood City’s fair share of housing production amounts to 4,588 units, of <br />which 1,115 would be for very low-income households (including extremely low-income households) and <br />643 are planned for low-income households. As of December 31, 2025, the City has permitted 118 <br />extremely low-income units, 171 very low-income units and 303 low-income units. However, a substantial <br />number of units remain to meet RHNA targets, including 826 very low-income units and 340 low-income <br />units over the remainder of the cycle. <br />Many jurisdictions find that by using the Surplus Land Act and public lands, they are in a unique position <br />to advance production of affordable housing that would otherwise be left to developers and property <br />owners. Under the Surplus Land Act, as much as 100 percent of the units that may be built on Lot B may <br />be affordable to low- and moderate-income households, with at least 75 percent of those affordable to <br />lower income households. As illustrated in the feasibility analysis prepared by RSG, subject to receipt of <br />proposals from developers, the City may be able to facilitate the development of between 70 and 104 <br />affordable units, all of which would likely be affordable to very low and low income households given the <br />restrictions of tax credit financing that would be desired by affordable developers. <br />FISCAL IMPACT <br />Redevelopment of public parking lots that results in preservation of public parking enables the City to <br />maximize utilization of real estate in downtown. Generally, Lot B and other parking lots in the City’s <br />Parking Fund require an ongoing subsidy from the City to cover operations and maintenance costs. While <br />these costs may continue even with redevelopment, such an effort would maximize the use of property <br />owned by the City and help achieve policy goals for downtown and with respect to affordable housing <br />needs. <br />If the City selects a developer for Lot B redevelopment, the City may face additional costs for land and <br />project subsidy which have only been preliminarily studied at this time. Any requests for a developer <br />subsidy from the City would be brought back to the City Council for discussion and consideration at a <br />future date. <br />ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW <br />This activity is not a project under California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) as defined in CEQA <br />Guidelines, section 15378, because it has no potential for resulting in either a direct or reasonably <br />foreseeable indirect physical change in the environment. <br />PUBLIC NOTICE <br />Public notification was achieved by posting the agenda, with the agenda items being listed, at least 72 <br />hours prior to the meeting. <br />9.B. - Page 7 of 8 <br />510