My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Browse
Search
Agda Pkt 2026.07.07 Special Council Meeting
RedwoodCity
>
City Clerk
>
Agenda Packets
>
2020-2029
>
2026
>
Agda Pkt 2026.07.07 Special Council Meeting
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/8/2026 12:12:40 PM
Creation date
7/8/2026 12:10:18 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CC Index
CC Index - Document Type
Agenda Packet
Meeting Type
Regular
Agency Type
City Council
Date
7/7/2026
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
341
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
REDWOOD CITY FAIR AND AFFORDABLE HOUSING ORDINANCE <br /> <br />Economic & Planning Systems, Inc. 22 Tenant Protection Impacts <br />The elimination of RUBS for rent controlled units may also have broader <br />implications beyond individual property owners. If tenants no longer receive a <br />direct price signal for water and sewer usage, overall consumption may increase, <br />as suggested by the San Jose experience discussed above. For City-owned utility <br />systems, sustained increases in water demand and wastewater flows can increase <br />operating, maintenance, and long-term capital costs, including the need for <br />additional water supplies, treatment capacity, and infrastructure improvements. <br />Higher system costs are ultimately borne by the community's utility ratepayers. <br />Consequently, the elimination of RUBS for rent controlled units may have indirect <br />fiscal impacts that extend beyond affected landlords by increasing long-term <br />pressure on water and wastewater rates for all customers. <br />Table 11. Summary of Potential Impacts from the Elimination of RUBS <br />Type and Incidence of <br />Impact Description of Ordinance’s Potential Impacts <br />Building or Unit Operating Costs <br />(all buildings that use RUBS) <br />Increase for units subject to the rent stabilization <br />requirements under the proposed Ordinance that rely on <br />RUBS due to potential for higher utility usage <br />Post 1995 Market Rate Multi- <br />Family Rental Buildings No impact unless Costa Hawkins is amended or repealed20 <br />Pre-1995 Multi-Family Market <br />Rate Rental Buildings <br />Potential long-term impact because landlords can only <br />increase rents to off-set costs when units are vacated <br />(absent a successful upward adjustment petition) <br />Deed Restricted Affordable <br />Housing (pre and post 1995) Minimal impact because RUBS is not typically used <br />Single-Family, Condos and ADUs No impact unless Costa Hawkins is amended or repealed <br />New Housing Production (City <br />RHNA Targets) No impact unless Costa Hawkins is amended or repealed 20 <br /> <br /> <br />20 If Costa Hawkins is repealed, housing that has been issued a certificate of occupancy within the previous 10 years is still exempt <br />from the rent stabilization requirements in the proposed Ordinance. <br /> <br />8.A. - Page 81 of 168 <br />91
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.