My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Browse
Search
Agda Pkt 2026.07.13 Joint SA PFA
RedwoodCity
>
City Clerk
>
Agenda Packets
>
2020-2029
>
2026
>
Agda Pkt 2026.07.13 Joint SA PFA
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/14/2026 3:24:28 PM
Creation date
7/14/2026 3:18:50 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CC Index
CC Index - Document Type
Agenda Packet
Meeting Type
Regular
Agency Type
City Council
Date
7/13/2026
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
736
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br /> <br /> <br />4/8/26 11 <br />SB 35/SB 423, which requires at least 10% very-low-income units for rental projects or 10% low-income <br />units for ownership projects (although they must also meet the affordability standards in SB 79). <br />• Impacts your job—Effect of SB 79 Compliance on Local Review. Projects that comply with the TOD <br />development standards of SB 79; any applicable local objective general plan and zoning standards (to <br />the extent those standards do not prevent achieving SB 79’s TOD development standards); and any <br />approved incentives, concessions, or waivers granted under SDBL are deemed consistent and in <br />conformity with all applicable local plans, policies, and standards for purposes of the HAA (Section <br />65589.5). (Section 65912.157(l)). If a housing development complies with all objective standards <br />existing at the time the project is deemed complete, under the HAA, it cannot be denied, have its <br />density reduced, or have an infeasible condition imposed unless the local government makes a finding <br />supported by the preponderance of the evidence that the project would cause a “specific, adverse <br />impact” that cannot be mitigated. (Section 65589.5(j)(1).) Beginning January 1, 2027, denials of <br />projects that meet SB 79’s requirements and that are located in high-resource areas are rebuttably <br />presumed to be unlawful and are subject to penalties of $10,000 per unit. (Section 65912.157(m)). <br />• Impacts your job—HCD review of local ordinances. Local governments may – but are not required to – <br />enact a local ordinance to make their zoning code consistent with SB 79’s development standards or to <br />implement one or more of the local options to modify SB 79’s standards.6 Local governments adopting <br />an ordinance to implement or modify SB 79 standards must submit a draft to HCD at least 14 days <br />before adoption and a final version within 60 days after enactment. HCD then has up to 90 days (with <br />one optional 30-day extension) to determine whether the ordinance substantially complies with SB 79. <br />If HCD finds noncompliance, the local government must consider HCD’s findings and either amend the <br />ordinance or, if it chooses to adopt the ordinance without changes, include findings in its adopting <br />resolution explaining why it believes the ordinance complies with SB 79. If the local government does <br />not take either step, HCD may notify the Attorney General. (Section 65912.160(d)). However, other <br />provisions in SB 79 appear to require that alternative plans and other implementing ordinances be <br />approved or found compliant by HCD to become effective. (Sections 65912.157(n) & 65912.161(d)). <br />Ordinances adopted to make zoning consistent with SB 79 are not considered a project under the <br />California Environmental Quality Act. (Section 65912.160(c)). <br /> <br />6 Note that SB 79’s standards are effective and applicable in instances in which a local government does not <br />enact a local ordinance. <br />8.A. - Page 29 of 97 <br />247
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.