My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Browse
Search
2026.06.22 Speaker Cards - PC
RedwoodCity
>
City Clerk
>
Agenda Packets
>
2020-2029
>
2026
>
Speaker Cards - Public Comments
>
2026.06.22 Speaker Cards - PC
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/14/2026 3:28:25 PM
Creation date
7/14/2026 3:28:19 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CC Index
CC Index - Document Type
Speaker Card
Meeting Type
Regular
Date
6/22/2026
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
12
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
The AWS Program is continuing to pursue the following two projects: PureWater Peninsula and South Bay <br />Purified Water. <br />Proposed addition: append the following paragraph to the AWS Program subsection. <br />Cost exposure to Palo Alto and conditional position. PureWater Peninsula is currently budgeted at $747 <br />million for 6 mgd of yield (SFPUC Water Enterprise FY 2027–2036 Ten-Year CIP, January 13, 2026, p. 94). <br />Assuming a two-thirds BAWSCA cost share and Palo Alto's allocation share within BAWSCA of <br />approximately 7%, Palo Alto's potential capital exposure is on the order of $35 million, plus operating <br />costs. The City supports continued AWS planning, but conditions any cost-share commitment on the SFPUC <br />and BAWSCA demonstrating a supply gap that persists under (i) Finance-Bureau-class demand projections <br />(see Table 20 sensitivity, page 93) and (ii) a drought-of-record (1987–1992) planning methodology <br />comparable to that used by Valley Water and EBMUD. The City notes that, since the February 2024 AWS <br />Plan, three of six identified regional projects have been deferred and one has been canceled, indicating <br />that the underlying supply-gap analysis remains unsettled. <br />Editor's note — The current paragraph names the AWS projects but does not quantify what those projects could cost <br />Palo Alto. Three of six projects deferred and one canceled within ~24 months is itself evidence that the supply-gap <br />analysis is volatile. Recording Palo Alto's evaluative criteria in the UWMP — rather than only in correspondence — gives <br />staff a principled basis on which to engage future BAWSCA cost-share votes. <br /> <br />────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────── <br />Edit 4 — Section 7, WSCP Financial Impacts (pp. 97 and 111) <br />Subject: add a 2021–2023 Water Shortage Emergency lookback to the financial-impact discussion. <br />Existing draft text — UWMP p. 97 (Palo Alto's Drought Experience): <br />During the 2021 drought, City water use declined by 15% in response to SFPUC's system-wide voluntary <br />water reduction measure. <br />Existing draft text — UWMP pp. 111–112 (Revenue Reductions): <br />As a retail provider, the City's fixed costs primarily relate to the cost of operating and maintaining the City's <br />distribution system. Due to the City's volumetric rate structure, decline in sales revenue will exceed the <br />decline in expenses. For each stage in the WSCP and assuming 2025 rate schedules, the revenue shortfall, net <br />of the decline in expenses and based on FY 2025 costs and revenues, is calculated to be: <br /> Stage 1: Up to 10% target water savings results in $1.8 million shortfall <br /> Stage 2: 10% – 20% target water savings results in $3.5 million shortfall <br /> Stage 3: 20% – 30% target water savings results in $5.3 million shortfall <br /> Stage 4: 30% – 40% target water savings results in $7.0 million shortfall
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.