My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Browse
Search
2026.06.22 Speaker Cards - PC
RedwoodCity
>
City Clerk
>
Agenda Packets
>
2020-2029
>
2026
>
Speaker Cards - Public Comments
>
2026.06.22 Speaker Cards - PC
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/14/2026 3:28:25 PM
Creation date
7/14/2026 3:28:19 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CC Index
CC Index - Document Type
Speaker Card
Meeting Type
Regular
Date
6/22/2026
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
12
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Year <br />Annual <br />storage <br />impact <br />(TAF) <br />-469 -263 +41 -206 -14 -159 -208 -192 <br />Total <br />SFPUC <br />end-of- <br />year <br />storage <br />(TAF) <br />1,048 785 826 620 606 447 239 47 <br />Source: derived from data provided by the SFPUC; presentation by Yosemite Rivers Alliance, Table YRA-1. <br />Editor's note — The current UWMP describes the Design Drought as an 8.5-year sequence (p. 92) and presents the <br />resulting cutback percentages (Table 27, p. 117), but does not show the intermediate storage values. Disclosing the <br />storage trajectory in an appendix lets Council and ratepayers see that physical supply is not exhausted until very late in <br />the modeled sequence — a fact that is material to evaluating the >20% rationing scenario discussed in Edit 5. <br /> <br />────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────── <br />Edit 7 — Section 6, Climate Change / SFPUC Climate Studies (pp. 78–80) <br />Subject: respond to Commissioner request for an LTVA-applicability discussion in the UWMP. <br />The May 6 Item 4 staff report (p. 9) records that two Commissioners requested staff "take into consideration the Long- <br />Term Vulnerability Assessment (LTVA) and Adaptation Plan for the SFPUC and be prepared to explain how this work <br />applies to the UWMP." The current UWMP refers to the LTVA but does not explain its relationship to the Design Drought <br />figures used elsewhere in the document. Recommended addition: <br />Proposed insertion in the SFPUC Climate Change Studies subsection (Section 6): <br />Relationship of the LTVA to the Design Drought used in this UWMP. The SFPUC's Long-Term Vulnerability <br />Assessment, completed in partnership with the Water Research Foundation, evaluated regional water- <br />supply reliability using 100 years of observed hydrologic data, 1,100 years of tree-ring–based <br />reconstructions, and approximately 25,000 simulated stochastic model runs. None of the stochastic runs <br />produced a drought sequence as severe as the SFPUC's Design Drought (described on p. 92). The Design <br />Drought, rather than the LTVA's stochastic ensemble, is the planning input for the multiple-dry-year <br />cutback percentages presented in Table 27 (p. 117) and for the SFPUC's Alternative Water Supply Program. <br />This UWMP presents the SFPUC-derived Design Drought figures for regulatory completeness; the LTVA is <br />included to give Council and ratepayers a fuller picture of the range of plausible future hydrologic <br />conditions. <br />Editor's note — This edit responds directly to the Commissioner request recorded on p. 9 of the staff report. It does not <br />modify any SFPUC figure; it explains the relationship between two SFPUC products (the LTVA and the Design Drought) so <br />that the UWMP itself answers the question Commissioners raised at the March 31 meeting. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.