Laserfiche WebLink
Page 3 of 6 <br />City of Redwood City 1017 Middlefield Road, Redwood City, CA. 94063 Tel: 650-780-7000 www.redwoodcity.org <br />ANALYSIS <br />SB 1164 (Cervantes) proposes to repeal and replace language in the California Voting Rights Act (CVRA). <br />More than 30 civil-rights, voting-rights, and labor organizations support the bill. However, the bill raises <br />several policy and implementation concerns. <br />A more detailed memorandum from CPPG that includes lengthier background, analysis of potential <br />impacts, and discussion of the proposed amendments in included as Attachment A. What follows is a <br />summary of key points from that information. <br />Current Law <br />Under current law, the CVRA of 2001 prohibits a political subdivision from imposing an at-large method <br />of election that impairs a protected class's ability to elect candidates of its choice or influence elections. <br />Its reach is limited to at-large systems: a jurisdiction that converts to district-based elections exits the <br />statute's coverage, which has functioned as a practical safe harbor. Government Code 34886 lets a city <br />council adopt by-district elections by ordinance, including the four- or six-districts-plus-elective-mayor <br />structure, without a vote of the people. <br />Elections Code 10010 governs the conversion process: four public hearings, draft-map publication at least <br />seven days before consideration, republication for seven days after revisions, and a notice-letter regime <br />in which a prospective plaintiff must give 45 days' notice before suing, a city may protect itself for 90 <br />further days by adopting a resolution of intention, and letter-writer reimbursement is capped at $30,000, <br />CPI-adjusted. The seven-day map-publication rules exist today; they are not new to this bill. Outreach to <br />non-English-speaking communities (which aligns with Redwood City’s language access objectives) is <br />currently permissive. The FAIR MAPS Act imposes ranked criteria and process requirements on city and <br />county redistricting. <br />Impact on Redwood City and Recommended Amendments <br />In 2019, following a demand letter, Redwood City voluntarily converted from at-large to by-district council <br />elections. The City completed that transition without litigation and without any admission of liability. SB <br />1164 would newly create potential liability for Redwood City, and others like it the day it takes effect. <br />Under the bill, any districting or redistricting plan is itself a challengeable method of election; the by- <br />district structure that has served as a practical safe harbor is removed; courts owe the City's proposed <br />remedy no deference and may act notwithstanding any other law; and the new anti-reversion rule locks <br />the City's district system in place. <br />Under SB 1164, the fiscal exposure to the City is significant. Statutory reimbursement per qualifying <br />demand letter nearly doubles to a combined $75,000 plus CPI, defensive demographic and racially <br />polarized voting analysis can cost $50,000 to $150,000 per cycle, a full city-side response to a single letter <br />can run $150,000 to $500,000, and litigating a map or structure challenge under one-way fee shifting has <br />cost comparable California cities anywhere from $1 million to more than $20 million. <br />Support for the following amendments is proposed by staff to be included in the City’s communication of <br />its position on the bill: <br />7.D. - Page 3 of 17 <br />291