Laserfiche WebLink
<br /> <br />1127 11TH STREET, SUITE 300, SACRAMENTO, CA 95814 • 916.974.9270 • PUBLICPOLICYGROUP.COM PAGE 2 <br />based elections exits the statute's coverage, which has functioned as a practical safe harbor. <br />Government Code 34886 lets a city council adopt by-district elections by ordinance, including the <br />four- or six-districts-plus-elective-mayor structure, without a vote of the people. <br />Elections Code 10010 governs the conversion process: four public hearings, draft-map publication <br />at least seven days before consideration, republication for seven days after revisions, and a notice- <br />letter regime in which a prospective plaintiff must give 45 days' notice before suing, a city may <br />protect itself for 90 further days by adopting a resolution of intention, and letter-writer <br />reimbursement is capped at $30,000, CPI-adjusted. The seven-day map-publication rules exist <br />today; they are not new to this bill. Outreach to non-English-speaking communities is currently <br />permissive. The FAIR MAPS Act (Elections Code 21100 et seq., including Section 21130) imposes <br />ranked criteria and process requirements on city and county redistricting. <br />Federally, Section 2 of the VRA survives but has been progressively narrowed (Brnovich in 2021, <br />Callais in 2026), and Shelby County v. Holder (2013) disabled federal preclearance. Under the 2001 <br />act, no California public agency has ever prevailed in a CVRA case at trial; Palmdale paid $4.5 million <br />in plaintiff fees plus an estimated $1.5 million in defense, Santa Clara paid $3.3 million plus interest <br />and appellate fees, and Santa Monica's exposure was publicly estimated as high as $22 million. <br />SB 1164 KEY PROVISIONS (AS AMENDED JULY 2, 2026) <br />• Sec. 1 (amends 10010). Extends the full hearing and publication process to by-district cities <br />changing maps in response to a notice letter; makes public outreach, including to non-English- <br />speaking communities, mandatory; requires hearings to begin at a fixed time; requires notice <br />letters to be transmitted to the Statewide Database for public posting and placed on the next <br />agenda; permits a second party to file once a substantially similar letter is 45 days old; raises <br />reimbursement to $25,000 in attorneys' fees plus $50,000 in other costs, CPI-adjusted. <br />• Secs. 2-3 (amend 14025-14026). Renames the act and rewrites definitions. Method of election <br />now includes mixed district-plus-citywide systems, share-based (proportional) systems, and <br />any districting or redistricting plan. Election policy or practice covers any rule, practice, or <br />action respecting voting, boundaries, or the administration or schedule of elections. Protected <br />class becomes any group of individuals who are members of a race, color, or language-minority <br />group. A new definition of voting location is added. <br />• Secs. 4-5 (replace 14027). Creates two causes of action. Voter suppression: no political <br />subdivision or state agency may implement an election policy or practice that results in, or is <br />likely to result in, a material disparity or impairment affecting protected class members; once <br />disparity is shown, the agency must prove by clear and convincing evidence that the practice is <br />necessary to a compelling, particularized interest with no reasonable alternative. Vote dilution: <br />no political subdivision may employ a method of election that has or will likely have a diluting <br />effect where another constitutionally permissible method would mitigate it. Intent is not <br />required for either claim. The provision also reaches undue burdens tied to incarceration or a <br />prior conviction (14027(a)(5)). Pending cases remain under 2001 standards for liability. <br />7.D. - Page 8 of 17 <br />296