My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Browse
Search
Agda Pkt 2026.07.27 Joint SA PFA
RedwoodCity
>
City Clerk
>
Agenda Packets
>
2020-2029
>
2026
>
Agda Pkt 2026.07.27 Joint SA PFA
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/28/2026 2:11:26 PM
Creation date
7/28/2026 2:02:06 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CC Index
CC Index - Document Type
Agenda Packet
Meeting Type
Regular
Agency Type
City Council
Date
7/27/2026
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
1154
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br /> <br />1127 11TH STREET, SUITE 300, SACRAMENTO, CA 95814 • 916.974.9270 • PUBLICPOLICYGROUP.COM PAGE 6 <br />Claim CPPG verification <br />Effectively bans citywide-elected mayors Concerning but not banned. No office is banned, but <br />mixed structures lose insulation and a court could <br />order a fully districted remedy. <br />Cities could be violated for not allowing <br />noncitizen voting <br />Speculative and weak. Protected class remains race, <br />color, and language-minority groups; we advise <br />against raising it. <br />Every 2021 and 2031 map becomes <br />litigable <br />Substantially accurate. Districting plans are <br />themselves a method of election, and amended <br />Section 21130 expressly requires CVRA 2026 <br />compliance. <br />POTENTIAL LEGAL CONFLICTS <br />• FAIR MAPS Act. Court-ordered remedies run notwithstanding any other law, so a remedial map <br />may depart from the FAIR MAPS ranked criteria, now written into amended Section 21130, that <br />bound the City when it drew its own map. The bill creates a regime where a compliant map can <br />be displaced by a noncompliant one. <br />• Federal constitutional questions. After Callais, race-conscious remedial map-drawing faces <br />tighter equal-protection limits; a state statute compelling courts to order race-conscious <br />remedies will be tested against that ceiling. The bill's state-law-only declaration in 14029(f) is <br />an anti-removal device; a description of it as a bar on federal challenges is inaccurate, and any <br />defendant may still raise federal constitutional defenses. <br />• Privilege and separation of powers (largely resolved). The earlier version's broad bar on <br />legislative, executive, and deliberative privilege drew the strongest separation-of-powers <br />objection. The July 2 amendments removed it and, in 14029(k), affirmatively preserved <br />legislative-deliberation protections. This concern is now largely addressed, though the liberal- <br />construction command and the no-deference remedy rule remain. <br />• Voting-system certification gap. Because a court may order a share-based or other <br />alternative method of election, but the Secretary of State is not required to certify systems for <br />such methods until December 31, 2028 (new Article 1.5), a remedy could be ordered before <br />certified equipment and procedures exist, creating an implementation and cost gap for the <br />affected city. <br />TIMING AND LOCATION OF THE BILL <br /> <br />The bill passed out of the Assembly Elections Committee on July 1 and was referred to the <br />committee on Appropriations. The bill has not been calendared for an Appropriations hearing, but <br />it will be heard after the legislature returns from recess on August 3 but before August 14 to continue <br />advancing through the legislature. If the bill passes out of Appropriations, it will then be heard on the <br />7.D. - Page 12 of 17 <br />300
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.