Laserfiche WebLink
City of Redwood City <br />Management’s Discussion and Analysis (Unaudited) (Continued) <br />For the Year Ended June 30, 2025 <br /> <br /> <br />16 <br />Port Fund – The Port of Redwood City fund realized operating income of $2.5 million in the current fiscal year, $0.7 <br />million lower than the operating income of $3.2 million in the prior fiscal year. This decrease in operating income is <br />the result of increased expenses ($2.2 million) in comparison to fiscal year 2023-24. Increased maintenance services <br />costs, up $1.7 million, was the primary driver of the year-over-year increase. <br /> <br /> <br />GENERAL FUND BUDGETARY HIGHLIGHTS <br /> <br />Overall, revenues were $18.1 million higher than budget primarily due to better-than-projected performance for <br />investment income, charges for services, and other revenues. <br /> <br />Property taxes were slightly below, $0.6 million, the budgeted amount of $83.3 million. Better-than-expected results <br />in the Educational Revenue Augmentation Fund rebate and Property Tax in lieu of Vehicle License Fee revenues were <br />offset by secured, unsecured, and former redevelopment agency taxes not meeting expectations. Overall, the variance <br />in property tax revenue budget-to-actuals was minimal and reflected accurate projections. <br /> <br />Sales taxes were below budgeted amounts by $0.6 million and reflected the continued slightly downward trend in <br />taxable sales. Utility users taxes exceeded budget by $1.4 million, reflecting an increase in utility rates, and other taxes <br />exceeded budgeted amounts by $0.5 million, primarily due to stronger than expected business license tax revenue. <br /> <br />Licenses and permits exceeded budgeted amounts by $0.8 million, which was largely a function of fire permit revenues <br />that were $0.5 million above expected amounts. <br /> <br />Fines, forfeitures, and penalties finished the year slightly below budget at $0.38 million, and investment income was <br />$4.0 million above budget, finishing at $6.2 million. The latter was the result of better-than-expected returns on the <br />City’s investment portfolio attributable to the general fund, as well as a $2.4 million unrealized gain on investments. <br /> <br />Intergovernmental revenue finished at $8.1 million, $2.0 million better than the final budgeted amount. This was <br />predominantly the result of increased grant funding and program reimbursements. <br /> <br />Charges for current services revenue was higher than budget by $7.5 million and was primarily due to better-then- <br />expected amounts for planning and building services, fire services, and recreation services. <br /> <br />Overall, operating expenditures were $0.2 million lower than the final budget appropriation. While there were budget- <br />to-actual variances amongst the various operating departments, these variances were generally modest. Worth noting is <br />that most departments slightly exceeded their final budget appropriations, with this overage being offset by a $3.1 <br />million positive variance in general government activities. <br /> <br />7.C. - Page 48 of 269 <br />67