My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Browse
Search
2026.07.27 Speakers Cards - PC
RedwoodCity
>
City Clerk
>
Agenda Packets
>
2020-2029
>
2026
>
Speaker Cards - Public Comments
>
2026.07.27 Speakers Cards - PC
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/28/2026 2:26:25 PM
Creation date
7/28/2026 2:26:02 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CC Index
CC Index - Document Type
Speaker Card
Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
48
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
of long-term ownership. My uncle told me a long time ago, "respect your Tenants and <br />they will help take care of you." along with "you don't make an income overnight, you <br />make it over time." <br />This measure will change all of that, and in many ways described in the 9212 <br />Documents, especially where a Tenant is unlawful in the most extreme ways is not <br />subject to eviction, will lead to a most terrible living environment, City-wide. But not our <br />neighboring Cities. Tragic! <br />The long-term consequences of this action, WILL be devastating. I simply can't imagine <br />what our beautiful City will look like in 10 years with this type of measure in place. The <br />best Tenants will either be gone, and the vulnerable ones will live in fear constantly, with <br />their safety always at risk and their living space will continually decay for lack of care. I <br />for one, will not improve any aspect of the property with virtually a fixed rate of rent in <br />perpetuity. Just fix only maintenance related issues, and if there is no respect taken by <br />the Tenants to care for their place, then I will be coming to the City for answers. The City <br />will become a police-oriented department, dealing with crime you have never seen <br />before. Also, your worst nightmares of running a housing authority department will be <br />realized. I haven't mentioned how costly this will be to you as a City. There is no model of <br />any government of this magnitude of change that you can measure the costs against. <br />The costs to the Housing Providers have no model either, and it could cause financial <br />failure for some of these newly purchased properties since many transactions use <br />mortgages to purchase them. You will also see "redlining" work its way into the banking <br />system or just simply the inability of banks to provide financing due to the substandard <br />financials these properties will incur. You will see Housing Provider/Tenant <br />Relationships erode. If passed, the worst is yet to come. Just take a close look at San <br />Francisco or Los Angeles. Those are big cities where you can hide some of the problem <br />areas, but Redwood City is a suburb, and the effects will be obvious in all aspects of <br />living in Redwood City. I ask you, who would want to live here? <br />You know the answer. Do what you have been doing; keep implementing housing <br />policies that promote housing development both in terms of rental and ownership <br />housing. Help the smaller developers with the smaller development projects. Housing <br />availability grows in these ways too. They can be very helpful over a period of time to be <br />impactful to your housing numbers. <br />Stand together as a Council and officially stand against a measure that has no business <br />being on the ballot in the first place in a City that cares for the most vulnerable in <br />comparison to other Cities on the Peninsula. <br />Respectfully,
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.