Laserfiche WebLink
<br />7A - ATTACHMENT NO.2 <br />Page 18 <br /> <br />If such occurrences are confirmed, then USACE would have to engage in section 7 <br />consultations with USFWS to address impacts to the snowy plover. As part of the section <br />7 consultation process, USFWS will issue a biological opinion concerning the plover, <br />along with any other listed species that may be adversely affected by the project. The <br />opinion will address whether the project will jeopardize the continued existence of the <br />plover or other listed species. The opinion will also identify measures that need to be <br />carried out in order to avoid such jeopardy to the listed species. If USACE issues a 404 <br />permit to DMB, then the permit is likely to incorporate the measures identified by <br />USFWS through the section 7 process. <br /> <br />Other species that are present in the region include the California Clapper Rail and <br />the salt marsh harvest mouse, both of which are listed as "endangered" under ESA. The <br />Clapper Rail is known to be present on Greco Island, which is separated from the <br />Saltworks site by Westpoint and First Sloughs. <br /> <br />If the City moves forward with the CEQA process, then as part of that process the <br />City will retain biologists who will consult with resource agencies (including USFWS) to <br />determine whether these or other species may be present. In addition, DMB and Cargill <br />will likely provide information obtained by their own biological consultants regarding <br />existing biological conditions on the site. <br /> <br />We understand USFWS is preparing a draft recovery plan for tidal marsh species <br />in the San Francisco Bay Area. The draft plan is expected to be released in the near <br />future. A recovery plan is not a regulatory document. Rather, a recovery plan is <br />designed to identify and prioritize management, acquisition and restoration activities that <br />the agency believes are necessary for the recovery of listed species. When released, the <br />draft plan is likely to provide insights into USFWS' planning goals for tidal marshes in <br />the Bay Area generally. The plan may also include a discussion of USFWS' goals for the <br />Saltworks site in providing for the recovery of listed species that rely on salt marsh <br />habitat. <br /> <br />MBT A. The Migratory Bird Treaty Act ("MBT A") implements various treaties <br />and conventions between the United States and Canada, Japan, Mexico and the former <br />Soviet Union for the protection of migratory birds. Under the MBT A, taking, killing or <br />possessing migratory birds without a permit is unlawful. The migratory bird species <br />protected by the MBTA are listed in 50 C.F.R. 10.13. A permit may be obtained to <br />remove covered birds so that they are not harmed by on-site activity. <br /> <br />In its letter to the City, PRBO stated that, in its surveys of the site during the <br />1990s, PRBO "documented between 9,600 and 24,800 migratory shore birds using the <br />ponds for resting, feeding, and wintering habitat. These were among the highest counts <br /> <br />18 <br />