Laserfiche WebLink
<br />Transit. This funding swap has the greatest immediate impact on transit operations. Prop. 42 <br />funding for the Public Transit Account and the Spillover is eliminated under this proposal. This <br />means a reduction of transit funding of $1.5 billion in FY 2010-11. <br /> <br />9A <br />Page 3 <br /> <br />The Governor proposes to fund capital projects for transit: <br />. $350 million in Prop 1 B funding for local transit projects; and <br />. $581.4 million in High Speed Rail bonds and $375 million in Federal ARRA funding to <br />continue environmental planning and preliminary engineering. and to begin purchasing <br />land. <br />However, none of these sources are available for transit operations. <br /> <br />Public Contracting. The budget proposes to shift $12.5 million in costs to local agencies for <br />developing Cal-Trans Project Initiation Documents for local projects. <br /> <br />Redevelopment Agency Property Tax Shift. The Redevelopment Agency property tax shift <br />proposed last year for FY 2010-11 budget remains. The Governor proposes to shift $350 million <br />in redevelopment agency property tax increment revenues in FY 2010-11 to fund county trial <br />courts. This is consistent with the approved FY 2009-10 Budget and is the subject of legal <br />challenge. However, the use of the funds to supplant state funding of trial courts is new. <br /> <br />State Cash Flow and Delays of Local Payments. Projects that the cash flow difficulties faced in <br />recent years will be substantially reduced, particularly if the budget solutions offered are adopted. <br />However, the Governor's proposal states that some payment deferrals will still be needed. These <br />are not specified, but city funds affected by these payment deferrals in recent years include <br />monthly payments of local HUTA funds and Prop. 42 state sales tax on gasoline funds for streets <br />and roads. <br /> <br />State Mandate Reimbursement. The Governor proposes to again delay payments to local <br />governments owed for mandate costs prior to FY 2004-05. This funding was deleted from the last <br />two fiscal years' budgets. <br /> <br />Public Safety <br /> <br />COPS and Booking Fees. Governor's proposal would maintain the formula established in the FY <br />2009-10 budget that created the Local Public Safety Account providing funding for COPS <br />programs, booking fee reimbursement, rural sheriffs, juvenile probation, and crime prevention <br />programs. The account was created by shifting the program funds from a direct General Fund <br />allocation to a 0.15 percent carve-out from the Vehicle License Fee (VLF). <br /> <br />The account would receive $442 million in FY 2010-11, representing a $26 million increase from <br />FY 2009-10. These projections fall short of the $500 million allocation made from the General <br />Fund in previous budget years. This funding, however, would expire at the end of FY 2011 when <br />the VLF increase is scheduled to sunset. <br /> <br />The Department of Finance did note that revenues would likely continue to trickle in past the <br />expiration date because vehicle owners have been making late payments on their vehicle <br />registrations. <br /> <br />Emergency Response Initiative. The Governor reintroduced for a third year his Emergency <br />Response Initiative that places a surcharge on all residential and commercial property insurance <br />plans statewide to fund the state's emergency response capabilities. The surcharge amount of <br />4.8 percent would result In an annual appropriation of $200 million towards enhancements for <br />CAL FIRE, the California Emergency Management Agency (formerly Office of Emergency <br />Services), the Military Department, and assistance to local agencies first responders in support of <br />the state's mutual aid system. <br /> <br />Corrections. The Governor proposes cutting the Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation <br />budget by $1.2 billion for the second year in a row. As outlined, this would be partially achieved <br />by changing sentencing for non-violent, non-serious and non-sexual felony offenses so that <br />county jails can retain a segment of inmates that would otherwise be sent to state prison. (Drug <br />possession is an example of a felony that would carry a one-year jail sentence in lieu of prison.) <br /> <br />3 <br />