My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Browse
Search
AgdaPkt 2010-01-25 clsd and regular
RedwoodCity
>
City Clerk
>
Agenda Packets
>
2010-2019
>
2010
>
AgdaPkt 2010-01-25 clsd and regular
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/9/2010 11:54:06 AM
Creation date
1/28/2010 3:51:45 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CC Index
CC Index - Document Type
Agenda Packet
Meeting Type
Regular
Agency Type
City Council
Date
1/25/2010
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
178
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />6.2A <br />Page 39 <br /> <br />Edgewood Road, a San Mateo County-designated scenic route. Trees within these areas of the <br />proposed alignment may require removal as construction proceeds across or in the viewsheds of <br />these three scenic routes. The exact number of trees requiring removal is not yet known, but <br />could be approximately 20 trees in Fremont and approximately 30 trees along Edgewood Road, <br />based on ground survey data presented on construction drawings and review of aerial <br />photographs. The impact on local scenic routes would be significant because viewer exposure <br />would be high from each of these routes and viewer sensitivity may also be high due to the <br />number of trees that would be removed compared to the number of trees present. The SFPUC <br />would replace the roadway, but not the affected trees, after construction is completed, which <br />would result in significant aesthetic impacts on these scenic routes. <br /> <br />. Mitigation Measure AES-l: Landscaping Plans. <br /> <br />While this measure would somewhat reduce the overall effects on scenic resources in the Project <br />area, aesthetic impacts on scenic resources from the removal of trees at Paseo Padre Parkway and <br />Mission Boulevard in the City of Fremont and Edgewood Road in unincorporated San Mateo <br />County would remain significant and unavoidable because the replacement trees would be <br />planted outside the RIGHT OF WAY and may not contribute to the same scenic public setting as <br />currently exists along these locally designated scenic routes. <br /> <br />Impact CR-l b: Tunnel boring and shaft construction and disturbance of Holocene <br />sediments could result in significant impacts on archaeological resource sites that are <br />potentially NRHP- and CRH,R-eligible. <br /> <br />The tunnel design requires that the tunnel be constructed within the San Antonio Formation, <br />beneath the Young Bay Mud, due in part to physical characteristics of the sediments. The tunnel <br />depth would range between 70 to 103 feet below mean sea level. The marine geotechnical testing <br />(Bass 2006) established that Holocene-aged sediments could reach a depth of 80 feet below <br />mean sea level and therefore a possibility exists tunnel construction could encounter prehistoric <br />cultural deposit.s. However, given the depositional nature of both the Young Bay Mud and the <br />San Antonio Fonnation discussed above, the potential for encountering significant <br />archaeological resources during tunnel or shaft construction is low. Nevertheless, tunnel and <br />shaft construction could result in significant impacts on archaeological resources. <br /> <br />There is no feasible mitigation for impacts to potential archaeological deposits in Holocene <br />sediments caused by tunnel shaft excavation and construction. The shaft construction method <br />would preclude any archaeological monitoring or testing. Saturated soils within the shaft walls <br />would be removed by a crane with a clam-shell bucket. These muddy soils would be loaded into <br />a truck and hauled off site. Because of safety concerns, it would not be feasible for an <br />archaeological monitor to inspect these soils prior to excavation. Observation of the excavated <br />material after they are loaded in the truck would not yield useful infonnation because any <br />arti~acts would be damaged and contextual information would be lost. <br /> <br />, ".. '" ':':'IfupacfLU'1:' 'The "ProjecfwoUld'affect existing 'hilidus:e' cbaracter:byestabHshiiiga ".. .. ' <br />construction site for four and half to five years at the Ravenswood Valve Lot, which is <br />adjacent to residential land uses. <br /> <br />The SFPUC has identified at least six locations where pipeline construction would be staged <br />within the SFPUC RIGHT OF WAY. These include areas near the Irvington Tunnel Portal (0.7 <br />acre), at the Ravenswood (13.9 acres) and Newark (2.6 acres) Valve Lots, and at open areas near <br />the Pulgas Tunnel Portal (0.6 acre) and along Edgewood Road (1.2 acres). The largest <br />construction storage and staging area within the SFPUC RIGHT OF WAY would be at the <br />Ravenswood Valve Lot. The Ravenswood and Newark sites would be used for construction <br />staging during the three- to four-year construction period as well as for tunnel maintenance and <br /> <br />29 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.