Laserfiche WebLink
<br />funded with discretionary grant funds, or is funded by a State with formula grant <br />funds awarded under the Act's Drug Control and System I mprovement Grant <br />Program pursuant to part E, subpart 1 of the Act, 42 U.S.C. 3751-3759. The <br />need for change to 28 CFR part 23 grew out of the program experience of the <br />Office of Justice Programs (OJP) and its component agency, the Bureau of <br />Justice Assistance (BJA), with the regulation and the changing and expanding <br />law enforcement agency need to respond to criminal mobility, the National drug <br />program, the increased complexity of criminal networks and conspiracies, and <br />the limited funding available to State and local law enforcement agencies. In <br />addition, law enforcement's capability to perform intelligence data base and <br />analytical functions has been enhanced by technological advancements and <br />sophisticated analytical techniques. <br /> <br />-77' <br /> <br />28 CFR part 23 governs the basic requirements of the intelligence system <br />process. The process includes: <br /> <br />1. Information submission or collection 2. Secure storage 3. Inquiry and search <br />capability 4. Controlled dissemination 5. Purge and review process <br /> <br />Information systems that receive, stofe and disseminate information on <br />individuals or organizations based on reasonable suspicion of their involvement <br />in criminal activity are criminal intelligence systems under the regulation. The <br />definition includes both systems that store detailed intelligence or investigative <br />information on the suspected criminal activities of subjects and those which store <br />only information designed to identify individuals or organizations that are the <br />subject of an inquiry or analysis (a so-called "pointer system"). It does not include <br />criminal history record information or identification (fingerprint) systems. There <br />are nine significant areas of change to the regulation: <br /> <br />(1) Nomenclature changes (authority citations, organizational names) are <br />included to bring the regulation up to date. <br /> <br />(2) Definitions of terms (28 CFR 23.3(b)) are modified or added as appropriate. <br />The term "intelligence system" is redefined to clarify the fact that historical <br />telephone toll files, analytical information, and work products that are not either <br />retained, stored, or exchanged and criminal history record information or <br />identification (fingerprint) systems are excluded from the definition, and hence <br />are not covered by the regulation; the terms "interjurisdictional intelligence <br />system", "criminal intelligence information", "participating agency", "intelligence <br />project", and "validation of information" are key terms that are defined in the <br />regulation for the first time. <br /> <br />(3) The operating principles for intelligence systems (28 CFR 23.20) are modified <br />to define the term "reasonable suspicion" or "criminal predicate". The finding of <br />reasonable suspicion is a threshold requirement for entering intelligence <br />information on an individual or organization into an intelligence data base (28 <br />CFR 23.20(c)). This determination, as well as determinations that information <br />was legally obtained (28 CFR 23.20(d)) and that a recipient of the information <br />has a need to know and a right to know the information in the performance of a <br /> <br />WBISS West Bay Region Node lvfOU Agreement <br /> <br />Page 31 of 48 <br />