My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Browse
Search
AgdaPkt 2010-03-22
RedwoodCity
>
City Clerk
>
Agenda Packets
>
2010-2019
>
2010
>
AgdaPkt 2010-03-22
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/23/2013 12:47:28 PM
Creation date
3/18/2010 2:44:32 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CC Index
CC Index - Document Type
Agenda Packet
Meeting Type
Joint
Agency Type
City Council and Redevelopment Agency
Date
3/22/2010
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
316
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Reserves. This could mean higher reductions and less reliance on Reserves. <br /> Council discussed the reserves being a"cushion"for special projects such as <br /> economic development and other initiatives that might come up, or a calamity. In <br /> addition, Council was unsure about what the state takeaways might entail <br /> consequently Council�oiced the importance of having a bucket of money to <br /> possibly deal with those. One Council Member noted that living on one's savings is <br /> not a healthy approach. Vice Mayor Aguirre commented that the deficit this year <br /> was fully covered via the use of Reserves. Council discussed slides 10 and 12 in <br /> detail going over different options it might want to consider. City Manager Ingram <br /> explained that there are three options as outlined on slides 7, 10 and 11. Council <br /> consensus was to also see options with cuts that exclude the use of reserves(slide <br /> 10). <br /> • Utility Users Tax: Mr.Abrams, Interim City Attorney, provided background <br /> information on prior Council actions and elections. He interpreted prior impartial <br /> analyses and shared the question that was put to the voters. He concluded that in <br /> reviewing the official record it is clear that there was an expectation that capital <br /> improvements would be the first use of funds from Utility Users Tax. One Council <br /> Member considered the trust and respect of the voters more important than the <br /> legal possibilities. Another Council Member agreed with this comment because of <br /> the uncertainty of the current budget times. This Council Member also felt <br /> uncomfortable going after more taxes. Another Council Member agreed with this <br /> approach. It was suggested that future taxes include a modernized language with <br /> set increases built in. <br /> On the Executive Team recommendations, Council said that packages are important <br /> but some switching between the options may be necessary. Council wants to be able to <br /> see the nexus between the cuts and the impact on the community. It was asked that the <br /> repercussions of the cuts to the community be clearly articulated. Vice Mayor Aguirre <br /> wanted to have an approach that includes partnering in decisions and she would like <br /> creativity with revenues, higher cuts and less use of Reserves. She is supportive of the <br /> 8%. Another Council Member would like to look at a two-tiered retirement system with <br /> everything being on the table. This Council Member is looking for strategies and to <br /> focus on Core Services. <br /> One Council Member would like to extend the terms of the BCC members whose terms <br /> are expiring soon. Mayor Ira agreed with a two-tiered retirement system and he asked <br /> for help from the unions as well as for a salary freeze. Another Council Member agreed <br /> that looking at service impacts is important. This Council Member also spoke about <br /> parking as an option that should be look at. One Council Member wanted to revisit the <br /> business license fee as well as special assessment districts. <br /> On the issue of the 34 upcoming Boards, Commission and Committees seats that are <br /> up in May,June and July one Council Member suggested extending current terms for <br /> one year. City Manager Ingram suggested a six-month extension clarifying that due to <br /> existing language in the Charter,the Port Commission may be an issue, and we may <br /> need to recruit for those two expiring seats. Interim City Attorney Abrams requested <br /> that this come back via a Resolution to formalized Council's direction. At this point Vice <br /> JOINT CITY COUNCIUREDEVELOPMENT AGENCY BOARD MARCH 8,2010 <br /> MEETING MINUTES PAGE 7 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.