My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Browse
Search
AgdaPkt 2010-04-26
RedwoodCity
>
City Clerk
>
Agenda Packets
>
2010-2019
>
2010
>
AgdaPkt 2010-04-26
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/22/2010 4:40:28 PM
Creation date
4/22/2010 4:20:32 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CC Index
CC Index - Document Type
Agenda Packet
Meeting Type
Joint
Agency Type
City Council and Redevelopment Agency
Date
4/26/2010
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
324
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />31 I Cily or Redwood City <br /> <br />7A <br />Page 37 <br /> <br />Funding Strategies <br /> <br />General Obllgation Bond <br /> <br />Citie~. counties and cert.ain other local government entities <br />to finance specific projects may issue Gf'neral Obligal.ion <br />honds, Dehl s(~rvice for (;0 honds is provided by an narmar'kc(l <br />propprly lax aho\'(' the one percent general pl'Operty tax <br />mandat.ed hy Proposition 13 (oft.en called a "1)rOpt\rty tax <br />O\'{~rride~). Thpse overrides typically appear on the annual <br />tax hill as "voted indehte<Jness". The pl'Oceeds from GO honds <br />can l.le use<11.0 finGlJlct> the acqubil.ion, cullst.r'lIcliun ClmI <br />improvemenl of real propel'ly, but cannol h(~ ww(llo pay [01' <br />equipment. supplies, operations or maintenance cost.s, GO <br />!lon(ls require a 2/3 majorit.y vote hy registered volers, <br /> <br />Special1axes on Property <br /> <br />Mrllo Roos Special Tax <br /> <br />Thl' :vlello-Roos Community F'acilities ACl permits various <br />local government.s to estahlish a Communit.y Pacilities District <br />((]i'f)) 1.0 fillCHlce new fcH'ilit.ir.s and/or' 10 pay for op<~rat.ions <br />and maintenance through the levying of a ~pecial t.ax. The Act <br />(as well as Proposit.ion 21 H discussed earlier) I'equil'cs a l\\'o- <br />thir'ds vot.e for approving the special tax, <br /> <br />I(edwoo(] City has t.wo i\,lello Roos Dist.rict.s - Redwood Shores <br />and Pacific Shores. <br /> <br />Parcel Tax <br /> <br />Cilirs. as well as counties. scllool districts and other <br />districts, can adopt a Mspecial tax" with the approval at <br />an election of at least 2/3 of those' vcll,ing on Ih(' measure. <br />The parcell.ax is a special tax that traces its origin to <br />Proposition 13, which, as discussed earlier. I)J'imarily <br />limited taxes on property values. The parcel tax is a tax <br />on real eslat.e !)81'Cels ami nol their value and Is authorized <br />under the Pl'Oposi lion '13 provision that. allows special <br />t.axes t,o he adopt.eel hy t.he 2/3 majority. <br /> <br />THE <br /> <br />SpOrts Management <br />lI- "G R 0 U P <br />~ <br />~ <br /> <br />Special Sales 'fax <br /> <br />Ul1(lE~1' some cil'cnmstancps. a special sales tax can <br />bt' imposf'd with voter approval and its rt\Vf~IllH'S <br />earmarked for special purposes. The imposition of such <br />a lax typically requires special stat.f' legislat,ion as well <br />as a 21:~ approval by tlw electorate, M(~asu['e 0, which <br />appeared on Ihe June 2008 ballot in San Mateo County <br />was such a measure, It authorized the imposition of a <br />I/H-cpnl sales lax on all sales of taxablr mr.rchan(lise <br />\\'ithin the County fOl' a period of 25 years. Tile funds <br />\\'ould be allocate(j to t.he County of San Matf'o. each <br />city within the count.y and the UH'er parI\. and reCl'ealion <br />special districts within the county, Tilt' amount that this <br />t.ax would gener-ate annually wOllld vary depencling upon <br />local economic conditions, the changing dr.mographic <br />characteristics of the area's residents. tourism and <br />business visitors to t.he county, compcLlLlve retail <br />opportunities outside the county and a numher of <br />ot.her facl.Ors. One estimale hase(l on the conditions <br />that existed in 2002 projected that the lax would likely <br />genel'3t,e about $1 (1 million \leI' year for the Count.y if <br />passed. Unfort.unately. Measure 0 was defeat.ed. <br /> <br />PRIVATE FUNDRAISING ACTIVITIES <br /> <br />Like many parks anlI 1'{'CI'pat.ion depart.m('nt~. Re(]wood City <br />Parks, Recl'eat.ion and Community Services has experienced <br />increased demand for services and decreased funding, Wit.h <br />shortfalls in operating budgets and capital funding needs. <br />recreation agencies are hecoming more proactive and creatiw <br />in securing funding. St.rategies include aIternaLive fund <br />development pl'Ograms focuging on securing prlvale funding <br />through various venues, Monies are available in millions or <br />dollars from philanthropic foundations and privat.e individual <br />gifts, While there is a large amount of funds availahle. it Is <br />Important to note that most grants and gifts I'equire that the <br />l't~cipie\ll hp. a 6U I c.;3 Puolic Bent:'fit (rrollpl'ofil) organizalion, <br />Incrt~asingly, cities. connlir.s and special distl'iets are creating <br />SUPPOI't Organi7f11ions (SO's) as nonprofit orgcmi7.ations \.0 <br />support. capit.al. endO\vm('nt and operating rrquireffi<mts of <br />projects under puhlic auspices. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.