Laserfiche WebLink
Context for this Zoning Text <br />Amendment <br />Consistency of past practice <br />? <br />Did not use 5,000 square foot increment for single <br />– <br />family <br />Did approve multiple Planned Development <br />– <br />Permits in the R-2 with more than three units per <br />structure over time <br />Did not appear to have one definitive maximum <br />– <br />development cap and see a range which caused <br />staff to make an interpretation and now to again <br />put forth choices. <br />2828 <br /> <br />