My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Browse
Search
AgdaPkt 2010-06-07 clds, jnt
RedwoodCity
>
City Clerk
>
Agenda Packets
>
2010-2019
>
2010
>
AgdaPkt 2010-06-07 clds, jnt
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/8/2010 4:43:56 PM
Creation date
6/3/2010 3:07:58 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CC Index
CC Index - Document Type
Agenda Packet
Meeting Type
Joint
Agency Type
City Council and Redevelopment Agency
Date
6/7/2010
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
145
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />7A <br />Page 54 <br /> <br />)- 3,333 SF increment - 6 units <br />)- 5,000 SF increment - 5 units <br /> <br />-Planning Commission Action <br /> <br />o Adopt the Negative Declaration (NO) and the Initial Study (IS) for the proposed <br />Zoning Text Amendment with the following findings; and, <br />o Make a recommendation to the City Council to approve the proposed Zoning <br />Text Amendment. <br />-Traffic <br /> <br />o Traffic Engineering staff deemed that a traffic study was not warranted: <br />o Not all sites would re-develop at once <br />o All new individual projects would expect to go through CEQA review, which may <br />include traffic studies <br />o "Worst Case" trip generation scenario <br />~ 208 new units = 208 PM Peak Trips <br />~ Over approximately 500 acres of land area <br />~ Distributed over at least 20 residential streets to several arterials <br />~ Traffic would be well distributed and within overall growth expectations <br /> <br />Following this was a Summary of Analysis table of R-2 Zoning Totals for Friendly <br />Acres, Redwood Oaks and West Woodside. <br /> <br />Clarifying Questions <br /> <br />Commissioner Smith asked when a PD actually kicked in. <br /> <br />Mr. Mehra noted this takes place when there is a development of four (4) units or more. <br /> <br />Chair Radcliffe asked for clarification on the Units per Structure scenario. She asked if <br />this applied to all the different scenarios. She also asked him for examples of sites in <br />the City which coincided with each of square footage examples given in the PowerPoint <br />presentation. <br /> <br />Jill Ekas, Planning, Housing and Economic Development Director, gave several <br />examples of some Downtown Projects in a variety of zoned areas: <br /> <br />. Franklin Street Apartments with 206 units was built out as an R-5 Zoning District <br />with approximately 45 units/acre. This has a higher density than what is being <br />looked in the R-2 Zoning. <br />. City Center Plaza with 81 units had a density similar to Franklin Avenue <br />Apartments and is also in a higher density zone parcel. <br />. Villa Montgomery was of a higher density, had its own Precise Plan, and came in <br />at 58 units which were built out at 95 units to the acre. It was a significantly <br />different scenario than the R-2 Zoning. <br />. Canada College was within an R-3 Zone but more on the order of 20 units/acre. <br />This was a three-story build-out with common Open Space areas. <br />. Habitat for Humanity on Rolison Road was in an R-3 Zone with 20 units/acre. It <br />was a two-story build-out and it was given some parking allowances. <br /> <br />Page 3 of 24 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.