My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Browse
Search
AgdaPkt 2010-06-07 clds, jnt
RedwoodCity
>
City Clerk
>
Agenda Packets
>
2010-2019
>
2010
>
AgdaPkt 2010-06-07 clds, jnt
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/8/2010 4:43:56 PM
Creation date
6/3/2010 3:07:58 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CC Index
CC Index - Document Type
Agenda Packet
Meeting Type
Joint
Agency Type
City Council and Redevelopment Agency
Date
6/7/2010
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
145
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />7A <br />AlfACHB 5IU.ltge.7:1 <br /> <br />10 <br />(~"'..- -...-....".-. <br />! ;:"~l" !i~ :,'1 T;'-r-;\l-"'--~~~m.' <br />.' I' "..', lil " . <br />: i I I .'..' ,,) '. II ~ '. , n <br />; , ~.') . ,:.1 I, l <br /> <br /> <br />fU~U APR 2 8 2010 u>> <br />l CITY or HEDWOOD CI1Y J <br />-----'dITC C~ERK <br /> <br />Date: April 26, 2010 <br /> <br />To: City Council <br />City of Redwood City <br /> <br />From: Mike and Michelle Bautista, 1543 Kentfield Ave <br /> <br />Subject: Appeal of Planning Commission approval of proposed Zoning Text Amendment Negative <br />Declaration for Residential Duplex (R-2) Zoning District <br />Appeal of Planning Commission approval of Zoning Text Amendment Inftlal Study for <br />Residential Duplex (R-2) Zoning District <br /> <br />Dear City Council Members, <br /> <br />We respectfully request the opportunity to appeal, before the City Council, the Planning Commission <br />approval of the Zoning Text Amendment Initial Study and Negative Declaration for Residential Duplex <br />(R~2) Zoning District. The format of this appeal is per the verbal instructions issued by the City Clear <br />Friday, 23 April 2010. Those instructions were write a letter addressed to the City Council that has the <br />following content: <br /> <br />. What you are appeallng <br />. Why you are appealing <br /> <br />What we are appealing has been stated above. Why we are appealing is documented below. The "why" <br />section occupies 28 pages. With only a week to prepare the "why" section, this document will have <br />typos, and possible Incomprehensible statetnents (i.e. the proof reading has been minimal). The "why" <br />documentation only references the content of the Initial Study and Negative Declaration, but not the <br />testimony at the public hearing. We did not have time to transcribe the Planning Commission meeting, <br />and provide additional"why" content in this document from the public hearing. <br /> <br />Therefore, we apologize for the typos in the document, and for the lack of completeness. If there are <br />any questions related to contents of this document please forward those questions to us. We will <br />respond quickly to any inquiries. <br /> <br />Since we should have at least a couple of weeks to prepare for a public hearin&. we wilt update the <br />"why" section of this document, and submit it for your review as earlier as possible. <br /> <br />Thank you for considering this appeal. <br /> <br />Mike and Michelle Bautista <br />1543 Kentfjeld Ave <br /> <br />1 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.