Laserfiche WebLink
<br />7A <br />Page 94 <br /> <br />This is an inaccurate statement. As detailed in the DENSITY ANALYSIS NOT ADEQUATE sectron, one <br />cannot make this statement without a complete and adequate density impact analysIs. <br /> <br />Page 8: f/Permltted average density In the affected area is expected to increase from approximately <br />8.30 units'per acre overall to a ma)(imum of 8.73 units per a<:re as properties are develop over time. The <br />total number of new units expected from the amendment is approximately 213 City wide.H <br /> <br />There Is InsufficIent Information to validate the numerical results as detailed in the DENSITY ANALYSIS <br />NOT ADEQUATE section. <br /> <br />Page 8: "Because it does not change any existing uses or permit any new uses ... f'. <br /> <br />this is a false statement. The proposed revisions modify the permitted uses defined in section 6.2. <br /> <br />Page 8: "Finally, all new development permitted by the proposed ordinance amendment Will require <br />subsequent additional compJfance with California Env;ronmentarQuality Act (CEQA) requirements as <br />part of the Planned Development Permit (PO Permit) process pursuant to Article 46 of the Zoning <br />Ordinances." <br /> <br />this Is a misleading statement as detailed in the CEQA EXEMPTION section. <br /> <br />Page S: "The proposed zoning amendment focuses on clarifying the iric;remental unit-densities for larger <br />sites ...J' <br /> <br />This 15 a false sgtement as detailed in the IlLEGAL PAST PRACTICE section. The objective of the <br />proposed amendment Is to legalize an ILLEGAL interpretation of the R2 density. No "clarification" is <br />required. <br /> <br />Page 10: liThe project involves a text amendment to the CIty's zoning ordinance to clarify the permitted <br />density on pqrcels larger than 10,000 square feet with the City's existing R-2 residential zoning t;iistrict.u <br /> <br />this is a false statement as detailed in the IUEGAL PAST PRACTICE section. There is no uclarification". <br />The objective of the proposed amendment is to legalize an ILLEGAL interpretation of the R2 density. <br /> <br />Page 11: "The proposesd zoning ordinance amendment meets these critera because the Increase is well <br />within the permitted density for the R-2 district in the current General Plan." <br /> <br />This 'is a false statement The 2004 Housing Element clearly limits the m'aximum density for the three <br />permitted dwelling type in R2: 8.7 units/acre for single family, 11.6 units/acre for duplex, 12.9 units/acre <br /> <br />20 <br />