Laserfiche WebLink
JAN. 8.2003 ' 5 "M MAZE.ASSOCIATES NO 662 : 4,6 <br />71 -C9 <br />Staff Sri ling <br />The 2002 audit was hampered during the final phase of test work due to City's staff untimely <br />unavailability. Significant individuals from the Finance Department and the Housing Department <br />were unavailable at certain times during the two-week time period of audit test work The City <br />should make certain that key individuals are available during the audit test work period, so as to <br />ensure a smooth, efficient, and effective audit. The audit dates are set months in advance for just <br />this reason. <br />Communication between Denaatments <br />The Housing Department and the Finance Department should improve procedures relating to the <br />recording of new loans. During Single Audit testing, an audit adjustment resulted from a lack of <br />communization between the two departments. <br />During Single Audit test work, we selected lntergladed Disbursement and Information System <br />(MIS) transactions for Redwood Oak Corporation as part of expenditure testing. in fiscal year <br />2002, the Housing Department requested draw down transactions totaling $241,400 from <br />Housing and Urban Development (HUD) for Redwood Oak Corporation. During the fiscal year, <br />no payments were received from Redwood Oak Corporation. At June 30, 2002, the City should <br />have a loan receivable balance of 5241,400. <br />However, the loan receivable was not recorded on the City's general ledger. The Finance <br />Department was unaware of the loan. The Housing Department generates the loan, and then <br />must notify the Finance Department about the new loan issued. Without notification, the <br />Finance Department would not be aware of the loan issuance. For this specific incident, <br />appropriate communication between the Finance Department and Housing Department did not <br />occur. <br />