Laserfiche WebLink
<br />ATTACHMENT 3 <br /> <br />7.A <br />Page 16 <br /> <br />DRAFT <br /> <br />ITEM 2A - 5/13/10 <br /> <br />Highl1ghts of City Meetlngs/ AA Presentations <br />April 1St 2010 to May 7, 2010 <br /> <br />Highlights include: <br />o Meeting Format <br />. Attendees <br />. Main poJnts/fssues <br /> <br />North Fair Oaks Community Advisory Council Meeting, 4/15/10 <br />o Meeting format: Open House} Presentation, Questton & Answer <br />e Attendance: Nine council members/ 35 people/ IncludIng two attorneys from CC-HSR and Jerry <br />Carlson, cltv coundl Atherton, Jim Eggmeyer San Mateo County TWG and County manager <br />. Main Issues/points: <br />o Support HSTI Jlbut need to be done right'l; Equity Issues - high local community Impact <br />(quality of life and cost) but broad benefit; only at grade and deep tunnel/at-grade <br />alternative - ~hat about trench or cut & cover? <br />o Discussion of how to have Dumbarton cross over HST to join Caltraln on west side of <br />tracks, as elevated or at grade wIth below grade HST and Caltraln with need for wIder <br />ROW for trans\tlon <br />o History of lack of community notification of environmentallmpacts, i.e. Highway 101 <br />Improvements caused flooding of several neighborhoods and city and Caltrans only sent <br />letters saying that they are not responsible for the damage. They want to know in <br />advance and ensure adequate mltlgatlons. <br /> <br />San Mateo community Workshop, 4/15/10 <br />o Meetrng Format: Presentationr QuestIon & Answer <br />. Attendance: Approximately 100 residents, several council members and TWG representative <br />La rry Patterson <br />e Main poInts/Issues: <br />o Concerns about Impact on Downtown local businesses and surrounding properties (not <br />taken) <br />o Preference for underground/cut and cover to minimize blight, property loss and <br />devaluation; construction Impacts <br />o Concern about funding, cost of project <br />o Questions about why not 101 or 280; why not stop In 517 <br /> <br />Burlingame CouncIl Meetlng,4/19/10 <br />. Meeting format: Council Presentation. Each of the 5 council members took their turn asking <br />questions <br />o Burlingame Workshop scheduled for 5/12/10. <br />, ,'., . Attendees: 150 people <br />. Main poInts/issues: <br />o Cost of outreach to cities and the expectation that cities might have to pay for a tunnel <br />If that Is preferred by the community <br />o A lot of business plan questions, especial.ly about the subsidy/guarantee Issue; how can <br />transit be profitable <br /> <br />1 <br />