Laserfiche WebLink
<br />7.A <br />Page 18 <br />o DiscussIon on whether grade separating Palo Road and Alma Street made sense. Discussion <br />that with trenches Oregon Expressway/Embarcardero need to be at grade. What to do to <br />grade separate East Meadow, Churchill and Charleston - aerial and at grade unattractive <br />with concerns about intersection and traffic Impacts at Alma (project and constructlon) <br />. Breakout sessions Included discussions of issues dealing wIth the selection of the CaltraJn route, <br />as well as assessment of the vertical alignments based on noIse, visual Impact, potentIal <br />property ImpactsJ and several other Issues (for example, safety). <br /> <br />MllIbrae CommunIty Meeting, 4/28/10 <br />. Meeting Format: Presentation and Question & Answer <br />. Attendees: 48, Mayor and three other council members. Attendees consisted of community <br />members, mostly from neighborhoods tight along the alignment. <br />o Main points/Issues: <br />o A majority of tDt: questions focused on eminent domaIn and/or compensating property <br />owners who may have to live with ongoing noise or other negative Impacts <br /> <br />Redwood City Community McetIngl 4/29/10 <br />e Meeting Format: Open House, Presentation, Ques.Uon & Answer, and Breakout Session. City <br />sponsoring Its own workshop on 5/11. <br />. Attendees: 70 people, Councllmember Gee <br />. Main points/Issues: <br />o Many concerns about property takes and the Impacts of a hIgh-speed train station. <br />o Support for stopping HST servIce In San Jose. <br />D Because the ROW is very constrafned In much of Redwood CJtYI the discussion turned <br />from the regular vertical alternatives to the alternative that stacks 2 trains on top of <br />another 2 trains. ThIs Is not covered in detail in the AAI s6 there was not additional <br />Information that the team could provide. <br />o Community wants c1artficatlon with City Council the City's position regarding wanting a <br />potential HST station! what the benefits and Impacts are to neighborhoods. <br /> <br />Mountain VIew Community Meeting, 5/3/10 <br />~ Meeting Format: Open House, PresentatIon} Question & Answerl Breakout Session <br />e Attendees: 1501 Council members Ronlt Bryant and laura Macias <br />o Matn points/Issues: <br />o Concern about how to grade separate Castro Street <br />o Concern about the Impacts of an at-grade solutIon at Rengstorff Avenue with depressing <br />Central Expressway <br />o Concern about potential ROW impacts to Evelyn and VTA <br />o Study below grade options <br />o Concerns about noise, visual Impact and safety with train derailment <br />o Questions about Highways 101 and 280 <br /> <br />Atherton Community Meeting, 5/4/10 <br />. Meeting Format: Presentation started but not completedl Question & Answer <br />. Attendees: 70, one council member <br />o Main points/Issues: <br />o The busfness plan Is Inadequate <br />o The ridership projections overstate the case <br />o Transit systems rarely cover their costs or make money <br /> <br />3 <br />