Laserfiche WebLink
<br />7C <br />Page 4 <br /> <br />CONTENTS <br /> <br />I. BACKG ROU NO........... ................... .... ................. ............. ............. ......... .... ............ ........... 1 <br /> <br />P HG/MCLG vs. MCL................................................................................................. 2 <br /> <br />Water Quality Data Reviewed for the Report ........................................................ 2 <br /> <br />Guidelines Followed for Preparation of the Report ............................................... 2 <br /> <br />Best Available Treatment Technology and Cost Estimates .................................... 2 <br /> <br />II. Constituents Detected that Exceed PHG or MCLG ........................................................ 3 <br /> <br />Le ad... .. ..... .. .. .. .. ... ... .. .. . .. ... ... .. . .. .. .. ... ... . .. .. ..... .. .. .. .. .... .. .. .. .. .. ... .. .. .. .. . .. . .. .. .. .. .. .. .... .. . ... 3 <br /> <br />Why Lead is Regu lated ................................................................ ............................ 4 <br /> <br />The Health Effects of Lead ...................................................................................... 4 <br /> <br />How Best Available Technology for Lead Elimination <br /> <br />is Applied by Redwood City.................................................................................... 4 <br /> <br />No Additional Action for Lead is Recommended.................................................... 5 <br /> <br />What Consumers Can do to Reduce Lead Exposure............................................... 5 <br /> <br />Ill. Su m mary a nd Conclusion. ......... ...................... ....... ..... ......... ............ .................. ........... 5 <br /> <br />IV. Attach ments................................................ ....................................... ........................... 5 <br />