Laserfiche WebLink
<br /> <br />2, Revisfons 10 the Draft EIR <br /> <br />B. Changes to the Draft EIR i"n Response to Comments <br /> <br />The text changes presented in this section were initiated by comments on the Draft EIR. None of <br />the revisions results in fundamental alterations of the conclusions of the. Draft EIR. The following <br />text changes are revised as follows: <br /> <br />TIle following text has been edited on page 3-4 (fourth paragraph, first sentence): <br /> <br />To the west, north, and northeast of the project site are several ~ aeres. protected areas <br />of saltwater marshes, mudflats, and vernal pool habitats that make up the Don Edwards San <br />Francisco Bay Wildlif~ Refuge, The refue:e contains 30.000 acres of sensitive bay habitats <br />in the entire bav area. and aporoximatelv 7.500 acres are orotected on the San Francisco <br />Peninsula north of the Dumbarton Bridge. <br /> <br />[Cargill Salt] <br /> <br />T/!efollowing texl has been added to page 4,B-22 (after the second complete paragraph): <br /> <br />In addition to exhaust emissions. Proiect-related operations could result in increased <br />emissions of fugitive particulate matter due to increased handling of cement. sand/gravel <br />aggregates. and other bulle commodities, Increased ful!itive oarticulate matter could create a <br />nuisance to nearby prooertv owners. However. pursuant to BAAOMD Rel!Ulation 6 <br />(Particulate Matter). Rule I (General Requirements). Section 6-1-310. Port of Redwood <br />City users are prohibited from emitting visible oarticles from fallinl! on other nearby real <br />estate, Implementation of Regulation 6. Section 6-1-310 would be required under the <br />Proiect and enforced bv the BAAOMD. Therefore. operational impacts associated with <br />nuisances on nearby oroperties caused by Project-generated fugi~ve particulates would be <br />. less than significant. <br /> <br />[Cargill Salt] <br /> <br />.... <br /> <br />The follOWing text has been edited on page 4. C-4 (second paragrapfz, third sentence): <br /> <br />Salt ponds can provide foraging and nesting. habitat for a large variety of bird species. <br />Resident and migrant shorebirds are most abundant, and common species include western <br />sandpiper, doolin, and American avocet At low. tide, waterbirds forage salt pond areas, <br />such as northern.shoveler (Anas clypeata), eared grebe (Podiceps nigrico/lis), ruddy duck <br />(Oxyurajamaicensis), Bonaparte's gull (Lanrs philadelphia), and California gull (Larus <br />californiclls). D!y salt flats and levees between salt ponds provide nesting ami femgmg <br />habitat for the federally-endangered western snowy plover (Charadrius a/exandrinus <br />nivosus) (Warnock et aI, 2002. USFWS. 2007). Many species ofmacro~nvertebrates <br /> <br />Whi11W5 1 and 2 Redevelopment Pm/ect <br />FInal EnvlronmenlallmpBd Report <br /> <br />2~2 <br /> <br />ESA/20nSO <br />July 2010 <br />